Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Missile officer recertification program makes great strides
 
Photos 
Minot Officers Progress
(U.S. Air Force graphic/Corey Parrish)
Download HiRes
Missile officer recertification program makes great strides

Posted 6/7/2013 Email story   Print story

    


by Kate Blais
Air Force Global Strike Command Public Affairs


6/7/2013 - BARKSDALE AIR FORCE BASE, La. (AFNS) -- Ten of the 19 missile crew members from the 91st Operations Group at Minot AFB, N.D., have been recertified and are able to fully perform their alert duties.

The remaining officers continue to progress through the retraining program with the remaining decertified crew members expected to return to alert duty in early June, according to Maj. Gen. Michael Carey, 20th Air Force commander.

The officers had been decertified following an Air Force Global Strike Command Consolidated Unit Inspection of the 91st Missile Wing, March 4. Twenty-two areas were looked at during the CUI, with the missile wing earning an "Outstanding" rating in one area, "Excellent" ratings in 14 areas, and "Satisfactory" ratings in six areas. One area was rated "Marginal."

The recertification process includes requalification training, a qualification evaluation and Emergency War Order and Weapon System certification briefings to their certifying official. Each crew member successfully completed requalification training. Upon completion of the training, each crew member also completed a procedural evaluation in the simulator and Emergency War Order and Weapon System certification briefings to their certifying official as a means of validating the retraining and crew member proficiency.

As a result of the inspection and further review, unit leaders identified proficiency shortfalls compounded by an attitude of complacency among a small number of officers.

"Leaders are taking a holistic approach to a get-well program within the unit, focusing on proficiency, as well as individual preparation," Carey said.

Prior to the CUI, Air Force leaders had already been focused on addressing concerns about the workplace stressors and quality of life of those Airmen responsible for running the nuclear mission.

Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III visited the missile wings at Minot AFB, F.E. Warren AFB, Wyo., and Malmstrom AFB, Mont., in November 2012. During those visits, Airmen voiced concerns about stressors associated with the remote Northern Tier locations, insufficient manning, long transit times from the base to remote missile alert facilities, and pressures of the nuclear, no-fail mission.

"Leaders at all levels -- from the wings, to Numbered Air Force, to Major Command, to Headquarters Air Force and United States Strategic Command -- are paying attention to the nuclear deterrence mission. We must take care of the Airmen and families responsible for this critical strategic mission," said Global Strike commander Lt. Gen. James M. Kowalski.

To get a quick assessment and identify those things that could be easily fixed to improve morale and job satisfaction, Welsh asked RAND to conduct a 90-day look at those workplace stressors, which took place from December 2012 to February 2013.

RAND's study is not finalized; however, initial findings validate that the alert mission compounded with workplace stressors impact the quality of life for those Airmen responsible for the nuclear deterrence mission. Commanders are already actively engaged to address areas based on this 'quick-look' review.

"Twentieth Air Force is acting on some of those recommendations now and has also begun an effort called 'ProAct -- Professional Actions: Mitigating Stressors on America's ICBM Team,'" Carey said.

Initial feedback has allowed Carey to act on several items, including improving communication within the force, empowering leaders to address issues within their team and taking care of Airmen. Specifically, one of Carey's first initiatives has been to help ensure more predictability in the missile field personnel schedules and enforcing what he referred to as "protected time off."

"I asked the wing commanders to ensure that people's time off is protected and duty schedules managed closely to ensure they'll have predictable time for their personal lives," Carey described. "Knowing when you'll be home is very important and relieves stress on Airmen and their families."

"As the 20th Air Force commander it's my responsibility to ensure that the Airmen who provide our nation's nuclear deterrent have the resources they need and a safe and healthy work environment," Carey said.

Further study is ongoing at multiple levels and this review helped the 20th AF and unit leaders take a definite step forward on a path toward addressing ICBM force stressors. The Air Force chief of staff is scheduled to be briefed on the results this month.



tabComments
6/17/2013 10:04:31 AM ET
I retired in 1983 with 20 years service. The military today is a far cry from what it was when I enlisted. I saw the downward spiral beginning 2 years before my retirement. Discipline today What is thatPolitical correctness has run amok and it is so apparent in today's military I doubt I could do my 20 years again. The current political correctness that has infiltrated today's forces has slowly contributed to their deterioration . I hope the services survive and once again become strong forces to be recognized.
msgtret, alamogordo nm
 
6/17/2013 9:49:58 AM ET
Missileers go through a rigorous amount of training to be certified for duty. Once complete they can expect monthly training...but as with any profession you have to take it seriously. As a former missileer I worked harder at learning my weapon system than I did earning my undergraduate degree. Don't let the actions of a few complacent crew members allow you to believe that the majority of our fine young men and women serving as silent sentinels don't take the job VERY seriously.Jerry - did you do your crew time at Minot
Ken, Florida
 
6/13/2013 4:19:15 PM ET
Sgt Snorkle yes I am brave and proud. Proud to speak about the toxic leaders that don't belong. Positive attitude and leadership equal mission success they don't have it and their services are no longer needed.
JD, KC MO
 
6/12/2013 4:28:08 PM ET
Agree with Buzz L. This problem had nothing to do with the nomenclature of AFIs vs AFRs nor a lack of OJT or initial training. A poor and lazy attitude by a small portion of that wing's crew force as well as a forwarded internal email brought all this unwarranted attention to what is inherently the wing's beeswax to fix. However this laziness and viloation of technical orders and other operating procedures did result in dereliction of duty as described by UCMJ Article 92 for failing to obey an order a technical order in this case. Curious whether than just handspanking and retraining that leadership will push the UCMJ envelope. That will change attitudes real fast. Remember does not meet standards is still a valid option on an OPR.
JAFSO, Saddle Rock CO
 
6/12/2013 11:11:52 AM ET
The answer is simple...the nuclear forces lost their edge when SAC went away. AF leadership at the time tried to lump the strategic and tactical communities into one command and it failed...remember also the Composite Wing debacle.And yes JD--it takes a really brave person to sit at your computer and attack someone's character and service...you should be proud of yourself.
Sgt Snorkle, USA
 
6/12/2013 10:06:55 AM ET
As someone that did missiles for 7 years before moving over to space I can assure you there are checklists trainingevaluation every month and regulations in missile operations. Just because a few missiliers decided to not follow the rules or just have bad morale about their jobs does not mean this is a AFI vs AFR issue OJT etc. Trust me the Coast Guard does not have stricter rules than ICBMsnukes.
Buzz Lightyear, Outer Space
 
6/11/2013 8:56:22 PM ET
The comments on af.mil are often embarrassing for the Air Force as JD in KC MO just proved. I'm sorry if the truth hurts and you don't have skin thick enough to accept the years of experience and reality that Jerry and MSgt K dealt with. Correcting grammar and calling out a retiree while discrediting his service is quite high of you.
Lt D., OK
 
6/11/2013 5:44:38 PM ET
@JD - I'm not sure what you're talking about with regards to MSgt K being a MSgt and knowing the difference between AFRs and AFIs. I am a MSgt and when I joined in 1994 everything was an AFR. I believe those changed to AFIs in 1995 or 1996. The average sew-on time for SMSgt is usually around 19 years so you're absolutely incorrect regarding MSgt K being stalled. Yes maybe he incorrectly used apostrophes. You're right about that. Whether something is called an instruction or a regulation the beginning of AFIs still state something along the lines of compliance with this publication is MANDATORY so I don't care what they call the documents. It's on all of us as leaders to enforce the standard. We are failing.
MSgt Brian Potvin, Deployed SWA
 
6/10/2013 3:45:38 PM ET
MSgt K learn proper use of apostrophes. If you're still a MSgt and know the difference between AFIs and AFRs then your career has stalled and the world's greatest AF does not need your poor attitude which is probably a reflection of your leadership.Jerry I'm glad you're retired. The world's greatest AF is a more professional organization without you.Powerful leadersship and positive attitudes make us great you both have neither.
JD, KC MO
 
6/10/2013 9:53:58 AM ET
I am a retired AF officer and former missileer. I also steered my son and some of his friends to the Coast Guard. A much more professional organization that truly demands excellence and professionalism. The Air Force has lost some of that over the last 20 years.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
6/7/2013 7:09:57 PM ET
I don't think this would have happened if we turned the AFI's back into AFR's that would be well written and detailed as necessary. Then bring back the OJT program that was the mainstay of training and qualification. One of many reasons why I had my nephew join the Coast Guard instead of the AF. I am a former AF recruiter even No training and no accountability is why I steer all qualified young people to the Coast Guard. They don't play
MSgt K, Newport News VA
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Reserve C-130s respond to Colorado fire  1

Air Force deputy undersecretary addresses aviation industry in Paris

Hagel: Opening combat jobs to women the right thing to do  10

Air Force Week in Photos

Farewell to a true public servant  3

Hagel vows to prioritize cyber, nuclear capabilities

F-35 is backbone of Air Force's future fighter fleet, Welsh says   2

Air Force Food Transformation Initiative wins big award  2

Hagel discusses 'State of DOD' in Nebraska speech

Air Force sets plan to integrate women in combat jobs by 2016  38

Ramstein Airmen build capability with Polish air force

Joint strike fighter on track, costs coming down, Kendall says

Welsh: Sequestration continues to drain crucial capabilities from America's Air Force  9

Program fights mosquitoes, trains Airmen  5

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
'Lucky' people take personal responsibility for their own success  4

Joint exercise through a new Airman's eyes  1


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention      Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention     FOIA     IG   EEO