Engage

Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Twitter
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
Logo
Facebook
2,342,597
Like Us
Twitter
573,075
Follow Us
YouTube Blog RSS Instagram Flickr

Air National Guard leaders focus on BRAC

ARLINGTON, Va. (AFPN) -- Air National Guard leaders are urging citizen Airmen nationwide to remain focused on their missions while they and others consider the organization's future during this year's Base Realignment and Closure process.

Lt. Gen. Daniel James III, ANG director, and Chief Master Sgt. Richard Smith, ANG command chief master sergeant, are looking at BRAC from a pragmatic perspective on behalf of the organization's more than 106,000 guardsmen.

Some Guard units may have to take on different missions, General James said. But the force will not be reduced because "BRAC only affects infrastructure. It doesn't eliminate people, missions and jobs," he said.

"The harsh reality is that the Air Force will be buying considerably less force structure -- airplanes -- than we now fly,” General James said. “That means we may close units, combine units or share airplanes. We expect to do some of each.”

Seven states would have no Guard flying units if the BRAC Commission, President Bush and Congress accept the Pentagon's proposals, the general said.

The Defense Department is still configured for the Cold War that ended about 15 years ago and that it must change to accommodate "the new demands of the war against extremism and other evolving challenges," defense officials said.

The four previous BRAC rounds eliminated about 21 percent of excess U.S. military infrastructure and reallocated billions of dollars to pressing military needs, officials said. If approved, this year's recommendations should result in a net savings of $48.8 billion over the next 20 years.

While acknowledging that Defense Department recommendations could affect 30 Guard flying units with closures or realignments, General James said this is only the opening round and that "if your flying mission is affected, I will do everything I can to secure a future mission that is relevant and funded."

The BRAC Commission will visit the affected facilities, conduct hearings, examine the service recommendations and make independent decisions about what to forward to the president for his approval by Sept. 8. The president has until Sept. 23 to inform the commission and Congress if he approves the commission's recommendations. Congress then has 45 days to reject the entire list, or it becomes law.

"The Air Force of the future will be flying fewer airplanes, but there will be significant needs for other missions -- intelligence, security police, space, medics, (unmanned aerial vehicles), air mobility divisions, expeditionary combat support, etc.," General James said.

"I will work hard with the Air Force to see that each state is covered with appropriate missions which provide for both state and federal roles and the homeland security aspects of each, and I will distribute a transition plan as soon as possible," he said.

"Overall, BRAC equals transformation,” Chief Smith said. “The Air National Guard is always changing. Change has been done by generations before, and now it's our turn.”

Observing that any BRAC implementations would take place through 2011, Chief Smith said "the mission of the Air National Guard must go on. Our deployments, operational readiness inspections and training must continue. As senior (noncommissioned officers), we must have the mission first and our people always. Remember our people.

"This is not the same Air National Guard that we older members remember from 30-plus years ago,” he said. “And it will not be the same Air National Guard 30 years from now.”

"These are difficult times,” General James said. “They demand clear heads and hard work. Work with me, (and) I will work with you. Together we will assure a future for the Air National Guard with new missions in a new world."
USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.
comments powered by Disqus