Engage

T
Logo
T
Logo
F
Logo
T
Logo
T
Logo
T
Logo
T
Logo
T
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
F
Logo
Facebook
2,010,756
Like Us
Twitter
411,971
Follow Us
YouTube Google+ Blog RSS Instagram

National commission reviews AF ‘life-cycle’ manpower costs

WASHINGTON (AFNS) --

With a shrinking defense budget, increasingly consumed by manpower-associated costs, the Air Force of the future may be determined by how much we can afford, according to the Air Force Reserve’s top officer. He stressed that finding how much an Airman's career costs through their "life-cycle" of active and reserve service is important.

 

The "National Commission on the Structure of the Air Force" interviewed senior defense leaders past and present on Aug. 27, to review the "fully-burdened life-cycle manpower costs" of active duty, Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Airmen.

 

"The Air Force Reserve supports the Reserve Forces Policy Board findings that the cost of a Reserve Component member is about one-third that of their Active Component counterpart," said Lt. Gen. James F. Jackson, chief of Air Force Reserve and commander of Air Force Reserve Command.

 

Appointed by the FY13 National Defense Authorization Act, the commission is reviewing the Air Force's structure to determine if and how it should be changed to meet future missions and funding challenges.  The commission's report and recommendations are due to the president by Feb. 1, 2014.

 

Numerous studies have analyzed manpower costs, but the Department of Defense and various think tanks have yet to agree.  If the commission can help establish the right cost model, they will be able to recommend to Congress the most cost-effective and operationally efficient ratio of Active and Reserve Component forces.

 

"Reserve Component manpower costs are about 34 percent of an active duty officer and 37 percent for an active duty enlisted member annually," Jackson said based on a computer program called the "Individual Cost Assessment Model."

 

"The earlier the member affiliates with the Reserve Component, the lower the overall life-cycle cost," he said.

 

The model captures the cost of career events: recruitment, training events, permanent change of station moves, deployments, promotions, transitions between Reserve categories, changes in component affiliations such as active duty to Air Force Reserve or Air National Guard, separations and retirements.

 

Also, the model accounts for base pay, housing and subsistence, medical and retirement costs, training costs, moving costs, and other compensations, entitlements and benefits.  The Individual Cost Assessment Model captures the initial accession and training costs of an active duty member who may transition to the Air Force Reserve, retaining that initial investment for the nation.

 

"We need to move toward an agreement on manpower costs," said Jackson. "This will allow for an 'apples to apples' comparison and establish common ground, moving the discussion forward to shape the Air Force's future structure."

 

Also, the commission asked Jackson to provide insight into which day-to-day missions of the Air Force could potentially be shifted to the Air Reserve Component.

 

"The Air Force Reserve maintains a diverse portfolio of capability in all 13 Air Force Core Functions," Jackson said.  "Future mission set migration could include rapidly-evolving areas such as space; cyberspace; intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; as well as more traditional mission sets such as Rapid Global Mobility and Global Precision Attack."

 

Jackson was asked his opinion on merging the Reserve and National Guard.

 

“All three components, Active Duty, Air Force Reserve, and Air National Guard, are crucial to our nation,” he said.  “We have different [administrative control] lines and authorities, however that is okay. All three bring something to our nation's defense and that diversity serves the nation well as we have seen most recently as readiness cuts went into effect due the sequestration."

 

The commission is led by the Honorable Dennis M. McCarthy, a retired Marine Corps lieutenant general and the previous assistant secretary of Defense for Reserve Affairs at the Pentagon.  The vice chair is the Honorable Erin Conaton, a former under secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness and previous under secretary of the Air Force.

 

"As the Air Force looks to the future, one thing is clear," said the general. "Our men and women wish to continue serving and putting their combat-tested, operational experience to use.  The Citizen Airmen of your Air Reserve are ready and continue to play a key role in the Total Force of today and the future Air Force in 2023."

 

He cited recent surveys by the Defense Manpower Data Center which confirm that the vast majority of reservists and guardsmen wish to continue to serve and that their employers still strongly support them.

USAF Comments Policy
If you wish to comment, use the text box below. AF reserves the right to modify this policy at any time.

This is a moderated forum. That means all comments will be reviewed before posting. In addition, we expect that participants will treat each other, as well as our agency and our employees, with respect. We will not post comments that contain abusive or vulgar language, spam, hate speech, personal attacks, violate EEO policy, are offensive to other or similar content. We will not post comments that are spam, are clearly "off topic", promote services or products, infringe copyright protected material, or contain any links that don't contribute to the discussion. Comments that make unsupported accusations will also not be posted. The AF and the AF alone will make a determination as to which comments will be posted. Any references to commercial entities, products, services, or other non-governmental organizations or individuals that remain on the site are provided solely for the information of individuals using this page. These references are not intended to reflect the opinion of the AF, DoD, the United States, or its officers or employees concerning the significance, priority, or importance to be given the referenced entity, product, service, or organization. Such references are not an official or personal endorsement of any product, person, or service, and may not be quoted or reproduced for the purpose of stating or implying AF endorsement or approval of any product, person, or service.

Any comments that report criminal activity including: suicidal behaviour or sexual assault will be reported to appropriate authorities including OSI. This forum is not:

  • This forum is not to be used to report criminal activity. If you have information for law enforcement, please contact OSI or your local police agency.
  • Do not submit unsolicited proposals, or other business ideas or inquiries to this forum. This site is not to be used for contracting or commercial business.
  • This forum may not be used for the submission of any claim, demand, informal or formal complaint, or any other form of legal and/or administrative notice or process, or for the exhaustion of any legal and/or administrative remedy.

AF does not guarantee or warrant that any information posted by individuals on this forum is correct, and disclaims any liability for any loss or damage resulting from reliance on any such information. AF may not be able to verify, does not warrant or guarantee, and assumes no liability for anything posted on this website by any other person. AF does not endorse, support or otherwise promote any private or commercial entity or the information, products or services contained on those websites that may be reached through links on our website.

Members of the media are asked to send questions to the public affairs through their normal channels and to refrain from submitting questions here as comments. Reporter questions will not be posted. We recognize that the Web is a 24/7 medium, and your comments are welcome at any time. However, given the need to manage federal resources, moderating and posting of comments will occur during regular business hours Monday through Friday. Comments submitted after hours or on weekends will be read and posted as early as possible; in most cases, this means the next business day.

For the benefit of robust discussion, we ask that comments remain "on-topic." This means that comments will be posted only as it relates to the topic that is being discussed within the blog post. The views expressed on the site by non-federal commentators do not necessarily reflect the official views of the AF or the Federal Government.

To protect your own privacy and the privacy of others, please do not include personally identifiable information, such as name, Social Security number, DoD ID number, OSI Case number, phone numbers or email addresses in the body of your comment. If you do voluntarily include personally identifiable information in your comment, such as your name, that comment may or may not be posted on the page. If your comment is posted, your name will not be redacted or removed. In no circumstances will comments be posted that contain Social Security numbers, DoD ID numbers, OSI case numbers, addresses, email address or phone numbers. The default for the posting of comments is "anonymous", but if you opt not to, any information, including your login name, may be displayed on our site.

Thank you for taking the time to read this comment policy. We encourage your participation in our discussion and look forward to an active exchange of ideas.
comments powered by Disqus