Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Fiscal austerity requires leveraging 'total force'
 
Photos 
Total Force
(U.S. Air Force Graphic/Corey Parrish)
Download HiRes
 
Related Biographies
 GENERAL NORTON A. SCHWARTZ
 LIEUTENANT GENERAL HARRY M. WYATT III
Fiscal austerity requires leveraging 'total force'

Posted 2/4/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz, Chief of Air Force Reserve Lt. Gen. Charles Stenner and Air National Guard Director Lt. Gen. Bud Wyatt

2/4/2012 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- In wartime and peacetime, the total force construct is virtually seamless, with Guardsmen and Reserve service members who are indistinguishable from their active-component peers. Our recent air operations in Libya are but the latest example.

The ability of our Guardsmen and Reservists to deploy on short notice and seamlessly integrate with the active force is unique and was absolutely vital in Libya. One critical reason the total force works so well in the Air Force is that many Guardsmen and Reservists are subject matter experts who work in related fields -- such as pilots and aircraft mechanics -- in their civilian jobs.

Given the fiscal austerity that lies ahead, we recognize the need for balance and maximum efficiency in the Air Force. In order to meet future challenges, the Air Force remains committed to a total force approach because the solution is, by necessity, a total force solution. We know that if we gut the Guard and Reserve, we gut the entire Air Force because they represent a substantial portion of our overall capacity and capability.

Air Force restructuring therefore will occur across the entire force, consistent with future trends and potential threats, the national security strategy, and our collective priorities and capabilities.

Such restructuring requires tough choices, and communication is critical if we are to achieve the "win-win" outcomes we all desire. To that end, there was a particularly concerted effort to work together in these austere times; the level of participation was unprecedented. Across-the-board involvement by senior active, Guard and Reserve Air Force leaders and state adjutants general demonstrated everyone's commitment to this important endeavor.

Additionally, the three of us work closely together in Air Force budget deliberations. All of these efforts are aimed at ensuring transparency and meaningful senior leader discussions on active, Reserve and Guard force structure, manning and institutional support.

When all is said and done, two things are certain. First, all three components -- active, Guard and Reserve -- are going to be smaller, consistent with the new defense strategy and the Budget Control Act of 2011's fiscal limits. Second and most importantly, we will remain a superb fighting force because our people -- your total force Airmen -- remain committed to excellence. The nation deserves, and rightly demands, no less. By maximizing the potential of all aspects of our total force, we will maintain the Air Force's readiness and effectiveness throughout this period of fiscal austerity and well into the future.



tabComments
2/24/2012 7:01:37 AM ET
TSgt Frankos is not correct. We are more than a nation of armies. The reason the United States will have trouble competing with the Chinese is directly related to Americas excessive military spending over the years. If we had been investing in education and infrastructure we wouldnt be losing so much traction with a developing China. The means by which America can catch up must not be our military strength. That ideology assumes that there will be a conflict one day soon with a country of 1.2 billion people. Not only does this mindset dangerously assume that war with the Chinese is inevitable but it perpetuates the ignorance in the United States that President Eisenhower warned against so many times.The military does need to shrink thats inevitable. What the military leadership needs to understand is that despite the pep talks you wont do more with less. Well do less with less and thats not something to be scared about. Thats what happens in liberal democ
SSgt Jason Ward, Aviano AB Italy
 
2/14/2012 3:24:02 PM ET
It is high time the Guard and Reserves step up to the same chopping block as the AD side of the house. We have endured numerous RIF's FSB's SERB's etc... in recent years. The AD side has been stripped bare. I feel compassion for those in the Guard and Reserves but AD has borne more than its share of the load.
AD CPT, San Antonio
 
2/9/2012 1:27:15 PM ET
TSgt Frankos has it correct. In 1929 the strongest army in Europe was France. In 1940 it took a couple of weeks for Germany to knock them completely out of the war. If a country MAINTAINS its military force it is in fact going BACKWARDS. As our force ages and capabilities stagnate our main adversary is continuing to upgrade its forces and move on to newer and newer technology. If I were South Korea Japan or Vietnam I would look at reaching an agreement with China now while I still could retain some semblance of independence. With leaders making statements that they saved some areas of the force shows we are rapidly becoming a FORMER superpower.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
2/8/2012 2:24:31 PM ET
We've often heard the battle cry One team one fight. I think a more fitting proclamation is One team and ready to fight. The team mentality starts at the top and we are all prepared to do our part regardless of component status or number of fights. Glad to be a part of the team.
CMSgt Tim Delph, HQ Alaska ANG JBER
 
2/8/2012 12:25:10 PM ET
Nobody I know has a problem with cutting costs. As a matter of fact it's high time. It's also time to go after the low hanging fruit and cut some of the garbage that does nothing but waste time. Ancillary training that is never used ORI's that test us doing things we have never been tasked to perform ridculous awards that are established to feed someone's ego and the insane fit testing process would be great places to start.
Bob, Ohio
 
2/8/2012 9:17:32 AM ET
Those of us who live and breathe the Air Guard know this is blowing smoke. Maximum efficiency By taking most of the cuts out of the Air Guard Thank goodness this will have to go to Congress. NGAUS will be able to help defend the states and the adjutants general. The big point paper about the ANG being the most economical part of the Air Force must have gone into the dust bin during their talks.
Very Concerned, New Castle DE ANG
 
2/8/2012 8:43:41 AM ET
I would just like to comment on the timing of the annoucement. The men and women of the 127th and 107th recently returned from their deployment to Afghanistan on Jan 9th. By all measures it was a successful deployment with thousands of sorties flown. Many were just returning from their leave when the announcement was made that Selfridge was one of the units that would lose their A-10's. After all their hard work and sacrifice they are told by AF leadership nice job oh by the way you will be out of work in FY2013. That sends a great message to the rest of the force. Welcome to the Air Force of the future...
TSgt John Beebe, Selfridge ANGB MI
 
2/7/2012 7:00:35 PM ET
It may be time to centralize major functions of the Air Force Global Logistics Support Center...build a more efficient operation. For example centralize the MICAP Stock Control ReadinessComputer Operations at one of the two SCOGs.
Donald Casing, HQ PACAFA4RM
 
2/7/2012 11:51:02 AM ET
How many more low paid uniformed personnel are going to be forced out only to be replaced by a civilian contractor making hundreds of thousands of dollars a year
Brian Phillips, Ebbing ANGB
 
2/7/2012 9:28:00 AM ET
We continue to do more with less while Congress does less with more. We will regret this in 30 years when we find ourselves facing a 21st century Chinese military with 20th century equipment.
TSgt. Frankos, Baltimore MDANG
 
2/6/2012 10:14:27 AM ET
Along with the Col's comment I'd be interested to see how this is going to affect associate units. As an example if AFRC has posession of X aircraft and the guard is an associate what happens to the guard PAA manning What about the other way around
Same, Here
 
2/6/2012 9:13:57 AM ET
In the interests of transparency I'd like to see a breakdown by component of the force structure changes proposed. It appears almost the entire aircraft drawdown is in AFRC.
Col Scott Reed, Toledo ANGB OH
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Aerial firefighting continues against Rocky Mountain fires

Through Airmen's Eyes: One Airman's journey to a brighter future  5

Air Force Medical Service website focuses on Men's Health Month

More military aircraft join fight against wildland fires

Fanning becomes acting Air Force secretary

Through Airmen's Eyes: Love, service, sacrifice define Airman's career  8

Donley: It has been an honor to serve with you in the world's finest Air Force  3  |  VIDEO

SEAC to Airmen: Embrace innovation, Total Force Fitness as military leans down  4

AF seeks scholarship, fellowship candidates  3

Reserve C-130s respond to Colorado fire  1

Air Force deputy undersecretary addresses aviation industry in Paris

Hagel: Opening combat jobs to women the right thing to do  12

Air Force Week in Photos

Farewell to a true public servant  6

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Our commitment, our community

'Lucky' people take personal responsibility for their own success  10


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention      Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention     FOIA     IG   EEO