Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > CJCS Army Gen. Dempsey: Political activity erodes public trust in military
CJCS Army Gen. Dempsey: Political activity erodes public trust in military

Posted 8/22/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service


8/22/2012 - ABOARD A MILITARY AIRCRAFT (AFPS) -- Using the uniform for partisan politics erodes the trust the American people have in their military, Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey said today.

During a discussion with reporters aboard a C-17 returning from Afghanistan and Iraq, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff addressed a question about a group of Navy SEALs who have put together a political action committee.

Dempsey has been outspoken that service members have truly earned their right to vote, and that all Americans are entitled to private and personal opinions.

But, the chairman said, he and his fellow members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are the stewards of the profession of arms, and must ensure service members don't cross an important line.

"One of the things that marks us as a profession in a democracy is it's most important we remain apolitical," he said. "That's how we maintain our trust with the American people. The American people don't want us to become another special interest group. In fact, I think that confuses them."

Dempsey said he believes partisan groups made up of former service members cloud the issue as well. "If someone uses the uniform for partisan politics, I'm disappointed in that," he said. "I think it erodes that bond of trust we have with the American people."

The chairman noted he has expressed this opinion before on his blog, and he said he has had incredible conversations in the blogosphere on the subject. He also discussed this soon after a young Army reservist appeared in uniform at a campaign rally, he said.

"We must understand why our military as a profession embraces political neutrality as a core value," he wrote in his blog in June. "We show fidelity to the Constitution every day by embracing this foundational principle. We are not elected to serve; rather, we elect to serve."

And maintaining this bond of trust between the American people and its military is key to the survival of both, the chairman said. The American people trust that the professional military will remain out of partisan politics, he added. The U.S. military does not stage coups to topple governments and place their own in charge, he said, and the American military is justifiably proud of serving the Constitution and following the orders of elected leaders.

"We're not a profession simply because we say we're a profession," Dempsey wrote in a letter to the joint force upon assuming office as the nation's top military officer last year. "We must continue to learn, to understand, and to promote the knowledge, skills, attributes and behaviors that define us as a profession."



tabComments
8/30/2012 6:30:14 PM ET
To everyone saying that by saying this Gen. Dempsy got involved in a political issue while in uniform you are incorrect. He is in uniform enforcing the UCMJ as well as AFI's and AI's. He did not show support of anything in this article except the code that all of us who wear the uniform are supposed to follow. As far as letting service members march in the pride parade in uniform that should be considered nothing less than a blasphemy against our afi's regardless of who authorized it. if you want to march in it fine do it but keep the uniform out of it.
Joe, Arizona
 
8/29/2012 4:13:15 PM ET
I have a comment from Proud Heterosexual I'd like to address. The armed forces already has a medal with rainbows in it - the World War II Victory Medal. Maybe have some pride in your country instead of your sexual orientation and you won't be so ignorant.
Fuse, ND
 
8/23/2012 11:40:20 AM ET
From Anton Myrer's military classic - Once An Eagle.So in the Libyan fable it is toldThat once an eagle stricken with a dart Said when he saw the fashion of the shaft With our own feathers not by others' hands Are we now smitten- AeschylusIt seems General Courtney Massengale wins yet again.
Colonel James Conrad USAFR Ret., Ohio
 
8/23/2012 11:25:44 AM ET
It probably would have been better served to sympathize with the frustration at the leaks refrain from commenting on retired members and remind people with current ActiveGuardReserve ties that we're not to make political statements in uniform. All of you who think this has anything to do with DADT repeal are walking embodiments of the broken politics in this country... stick to the issue. A one time exception was made for one LGBT pride parade to celebrate the transition and it has nothing to do with a government and military that repeatedly show we will sell out OPSEC for personal gain of one form or another 99 times out of 100.
Kp, Post
 
8/23/2012 9:38:25 AM ET
I wonder if the good General realized that by speaking out on the issue he has himself gotten involved in a political issue while in uniformNot a good sign that the guy in charge of all services isn't any smarter than that.
Jay SMSgt ret, DC
 
8/23/2012 9:36:40 AM ET
i cant think of any person in this country who has more right to express his political opinion than someone who gave over 20 years of thier life defending this nation. just sayin.
Bob T, florida
 
8/23/2012 8:54:21 AM ET
So if this was the rule then Dwight Eisenhower Charlie Rangle John McCain John Kerry George H.W. Bush George W. Bush George McGovern and countless others would not have been allowed to run for political office.
br, Nebraska
 
8/23/2012 8:30:35 AM ET
Gen Dempsey the uniformed members who work for you would likely take you and the UCMJ more seriously on this issue if the government would be less hypocritical about it. When the POTUS Senators and Congressmen stop using uniformed troops for political advantages there might be less of an issue of denying troops their first amendment rights.
Same, Here
 
8/23/2012 8:24:58 AM ET
The status quo of politics today does indeed erode public trust. However a special interest group consisting of FORMER military members is not the cause of this developing distrust. The lobbying groups that trade campaign dollars for future earmarks and legislation are more to blame.
TaPo, Japan
 
8/23/2012 8:17:36 AM ET
I would have to agree with the General. Even though the individuals are no longer on active duty and are private citizens them anouncing that they all were navy seals still puts an image of the military on them. They are veterans now and as long as they are alive people will still look at them as the image of the military and I'm all for them creating their own political group but they should focus on their views and not that they are former navy seals.
Monty, South Carolina
 
8/23/2012 8:15:43 AM ET
Sadly the general made his own political statement by backing US servicemembers in a gay pride event and then trying to deny former military members their rights. Either he is far left or needs some guts. We need a CJCS with guts not a politico trying to not get fired.
Paul, San Antonio
 
8/23/2012 7:28:00 AM ET
Oh and one more thing. They were FORMER Navy SEALS that formed that PAC not active duty members. As private citizens those folks are certainly free to say whatever they want.
Mike, Florida
 
8/23/2012 7:25:53 AM ET
Active duty members Agreed. Retired or discharged members Perhaps General Dempsey should consult the first ammendment to the constitution before he offers his opinion. Just sayin'
Mike, Florida
 
8/22/2012 8:36:00 PM ET
How about using the uniform to promote homosexual pride while marching in a gay pride parade I would call that not only using the uniform but desecrating and defiling the uniform I wore when I honorably served in the Air Force.
Del Andersen, Des Moines IA
 
8/22/2012 7:16:12 PM ET
That's right...march in the Pride Parade make a political statement and then pin on this rainbow colored ribbon or medal Our next authorized decoration.
Proud Heterosexual, Florida
 
8/22/2012 6:26:20 PM ET
Spare us the hypocrisy General. The people you speak of are all either separated or retired. First Amendment buddy. Noticed you didn't say a single thing when a bunch of homosexual service members wore their uniforms in a Gay Pride Parade recently. If that isn't using the uniform for political purposes I don't know what is. I remember when American generals stood for what was right instead of sucking up to their civilian political masters.
Otis R. Needleman, America
 
8/22/2012 6:13:02 PM ET
Agree 100 percent with the Chairman regarding military not being involved in political activities or statements. However former officers are entitled to share their expertise and perspectivesespecially regarding these issues when sensitive military procedures are being released by the Administration. Releasing the killing within minutes with all the Pakistan raid details was inappropriate. Naming Seal Team 6 was equally inappropriate. All this was done for political gain
Chuck Martin, Alexandria VA
 
8/22/2012 5:53:15 PM ET
Not off to a very good start as CJCS are we General First all of the people that are in that video are FORMER military or FORMER intelligence types. They because they are now civilians can now exercise their First Amendment rights. Rights they did not have while serving. Frankly if I were you I'd concentrate more about what info to keep from the POTUS and his underlings so as to not have it broadcast to our enemies for simple political gain. And maybe while you're at it you could clamp down on open gays marching in a political gay pride parade in uniform
Jay SMSgt ret, DC
 
8/22/2012 5:41:22 PM ET
but you are using our expertise and firepower to assist in the overthrow of governments.Do you have any comment concerning the 3 Batallions of Marines that are trained to quell civilian protests here and abroad
Paul Last, 60099
 
8/22/2012 5:25:57 PM ET
Agree but it needs to go both ways. Let's stop parading servicemembers as a convenient backdrop for speeches in hopes of gaining clout on national defense.
d. patrick, San Antonio
 
8/22/2012 5:20:17 PM ET
I have been out of the Air Force for a few years now but I do remember it and the feelings that I had about my time. and the people I worked with and called friends. The one main issue for me and all that has been said before and after my enlistment is the distinct difference of who I was then and who I am now and I like to think that I took the training and have carried it with me through the years and I am 50 years old and there is little if anything I have forgotten about during that 6 years. I was proud to serve and I still am proud of that service to my Country and a Country that I have always loved and been proud of. I do not think that any branch of the military should be involved with any aspect that will shed doubt on any branch. I believe and agree with every single thing that General Dempsey has said on this subject and it would do more good for this country when we all feel that way. Thank you General Dempsey for your Service to this Great Country. There are different bran
Jonathan Howard, Tennessee
 
8/22/2012 2:11:15 PM ET
But yet they allowed people to march in the pride parade in uniform. that was making a political statement.
D, Colorado
 
8/22/2012 2:10:45 PM ET
The group mentioned are composed entirely of FORMER military members. There are no restrictions on their speech.
Maj, Europe
 
8/22/2012 12:30:44 PM ET
The Chairman is exactly right. I hope he tells this to President Obama or any future President who gives a political speech with military members in uniform as an involuntary background.
MSgt Bill Brockman ret, Atlanta GA
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
CSAF to sponsor 3 captains for PhD program

Davis-Monthan Airmen work to end veteran homelessness by 2015

Jennies to jets to stealth: Bomb wing turns 90

Concentration camp survivor to fighter pilot: 'Freedom a beautiful thing'  5

Wounded warriors adapt, overcome at Andrews sports camp

Pilots, combat systems officers may be eligible for retention incentives   2

Alert Reaper Airmen find IED  1

Luke AFB F-16 crashes, pilots safely eject  4

AF drops 50,000 plus gallons of retardant on Colorado fires

352nd SOG welcomes Osprey to fleet

SecDef: DOD welcomes Supreme Court decision  37

Weather warns warriors, saves services silver  1

Squadron's lone female gunner aims high  4

Flight engineer reaches combat sortie milestone  4

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Our commitment, our community

'Lucky' people take personal responsibility for their own success  16


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention      Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention     FOIA     IG   EEO