Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > DOD requires more base closings, official says
DOD requires more base closings, official says

Posted 3/25/2013   Updated 3/25/2013 Email story   Print story

    

3/25/2013 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The Defense Department possesses more real estate than it needs and is looking to close additional bases and installations in the United States and abroad, a senior DOD official told a House panel March 14.

Air Force leaders agree, according to Kathleen I. Ferguson, acting assistant secretary of the Air Force for installations, environment and logistics.

"While we have no recent excess infrastructure capacity analysis from which to draw, our capacity analysis from 2004 suggested that 24 percent of Air Force basing infrastructure was excess to our mission needs," Ferguson said.

Since the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure, which brought very few changes to the Air Force and only 3.4 percent reductions to the entire DOD, the Air Force has reduced its force structure by more than 500 aircraft and active-duty end strength by nearly 8 percent, Ferguson said.

"So, intuitively we know that we still have excess infrastructure, while we spend considerable time optimizing the use of our facilities and carefully and frugally managing those facilities we know to be excess," Ferguson said.

Based on these facts, which were mirrored in the other services, another round of base realignments and closings should be an essential part of any overall strategy for reshaping the military, John Conger, the acting deputy undersecretary of defense for installations and environment, told the House Armed Services Committee in prepared testimony.

"Force structure is declining relative to that which existed in 2005, thereby continuing to add to aggregate excess capacity," Conger said, noting that the U.S. Army is reducing its active-duty end strength from 570,000 to 490,000 by 2020, and the Marine Corps from about 202,000 to 182,000.

"If we assume our bases were either appropriately loaded or were carrying excess capacity, these force reductions will increase that surplus," he said.

In last year's budget request, the Pentagon asked Congress for permission to initiate two more rounds of base closings under BRAC. Conger said the last round of BRAC closings, in 2005, produced $4 billion in annual recurring savings.

By law, under the BRAC process, an independent commission submits to Congress a list of military installations it believes should be closed or realigned, with lawmakers and the president then required to approve or reject the recommendations without change.

The Defense Department is examining further reductions in U.S. military bases in Europe, where Conger said more than 100 sites have already been returned to host governments since 2003, and where no authority from Congress is required for recommending additional closures.

"By the end of this year, we plan to conclude with a fully vetted list of options from which the Secretary (of Defense) can make strategic decisions for eliminating excess, preserving and even enhancing our ability to meet strategic and operational commitments," Conger said in his prepared remarks.

The U.S. Army already plans to close 33 sites in Europe associated with the decision to reduce brigade combat teams based on the continent.

(Information courtesy of Air Force Public Affairs and American Forces Press Service)



tabComments
3/29/2013 8:41:54 AM ET
As you notice the majority of the closures happen overseas. After living through the last round of closures it is nearly impossible to close a stateside base. No governor wants to let go of the cash cow that military bases provide to their local economy. The second and third order effect of a closure is lost jobs small businesses going bankrupt and too many houses on the market in that localized area driving housing prices into the dirt thus contributing to the housing crisis.
G, Incirlik
 
3/27/2013 1:17:34 PM ET
We can start by closing some of our overseas bases. How many bases do we need in Germany Belgium England etc. Those bases were established when the Soviet Union was a threat but these days Russia lets us use their airspace to reach Kyrgyzstan. Time to closely evaluate and trim our overseas presence. Also what about bases like those in Okinawa where the locals have made it quite clear we're not wanted
PB, US
 
3/26/2013 4:41:18 PM ET
It may or may need to be done but does anyone think Congress is going to agree to another BRAC They can't agree which direction the sun rises and sets.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
3/26/2013 3:41:42 PM ET
Why does it take a sequestration and everyone worrying about saving money to do something about a study done in 2004 If 24 percent of AF basing infrastructure was in excess in 2004 why have more facilities not been closed to reduce costs Especially since the 2005 Base Realignment and Closure brought very few changes to the Air Force.
Erika Glon, JB Andrews Md.
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
USAFE fighter squadrons affected by sequestration  4

Faith in captivity: Vietnam War POW inspires Airmen  1

Total force readiness topic of Capitol Hill testimony  1

Dover Airman in 'fight of his life'

JSTARS: Connecting the dots on battlefield  4

Airman returns home to provide humanitarian support

First Lady announces certification plan for veteran jobs  4

AF uses innovative tactics to tackle sexual assault  4

New under secretary sworn in during Pentagon ceremony  5

Family servicemembers' group life insurance benefit changes  1

4 Airmen killed in MC-12 crash in Afghanistan  8

Through Airmen's Eyes: More than words: Airman shares passion for sign language  1

Eielson AFB youth show 'Purple Up' pride

Deployed service members observe Sexual Assault Awareness Month

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
The rewards of challenging ourselves

Challenging the status quo: Leadership in today's resource-constrained Air Force  6


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security & Policy     No Fear Act     E-publishing