Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Hagel eliminates Distinguished Warfare Medal
 
Related Links
 Chuck Hagel
Hagel eliminates Distinguished Warfare Medal

Posted 4/15/2013 Email story   Print story

    


by Jim Garamone
American Forces Press Service


4/15/2013 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel has eliminated the Distinguished Warfare Medal, DOD officials announced today.

Instead, the military will recognize service members who directly affect combat operations without being present through distinguishing devices that will be affixed to already existing awards.

Soon after being sworn in as defense secretary Feb. 27, 2013, Hagel asked Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to lead a review of the medal.

"The Joint Chiefs of Staff, with the concurrence of the service secretaries, have recommended the creation of a new distinguishing device that can be affixed to existing medals to recognize the extraordinary actions of this small number of men and women," Hagel said in a written release.

"I agree with the Joint Chiefs' findings, and have directed the creation of a distinguishing device instead of a separate medal," Hagel said in the release.

Hagel added: "The servicemen and women who operate and support our remotely piloted aircraft, operate in cyber, and others are critical to our military's mission of safeguarding the nation."

The distinguishing devices will serve to recognize these service members' achievements, he said.

The undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness will develop the award criteria in close coordination with the services and the Joint Staff, officials said.

DOD announced the creation of the Distinguished Warfare Medal Feb. 13, 2013.

"I've always felt -- having seen the great work that they do, day-in and day-out -- that those who performed in an outstanding manner should be recognized," then-Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta said during a news conference announcing the medal.

"Unfortunately," Panetta added, "medals that they otherwise might be eligible for simply did not recognize that kind of contribution."

Members of veterans' service organizations and others objected to the Distinguished Warfare Medal, officials said. The medal's order of precedence was to be just below the Distinguished Flying Cross and just above the Bronze Star. Some commentators objected that it would rank higher than the Purple Heart -- awarded to those wounded or killed in action.

"When I came into office, concerns were raised to me about the Distinguished Warfare Medal's order of precedence by veterans' organizations, members of Congress and other stakeholders whose views are valued by this department's leadership," Hagel said.

The distinguishing devices can be affixed to awards at different levels, so, once written, the criteria for the awards must reflect that, officials said. For example, the criteria for affixing a device to an Army Commendation Medal would be different than those for a Meritorious Service Medal -- a higher award.



tabComments
4/23/2013 2:24:42 PM ET
Well said John. In fact I think we need to relook at the way we award decorations. If an AFComm is truly for Miltary Merit then justify the merit in giving this award to an Airman. Versus you were assigned to Base X for four years so here is your PCS dec. Yes we still have some people who think they is such a thing as a PCS dec. Take a look at Gen H.H. Arnold's ribbon rack sometime. You see a difference between his decs and what a nugget coming out of his first assignment has
A SNCO, An AFB Near You
 
4/22/2013 11:49:56 AM ET
This is awesome. First TA is back and now this. See whining DOES work.
Sgt Peanut, over here
 
4/19/2013 11:39:56 AM ET
For every posting that we should recognize these people who perform these duties we already do. They're the medals we already have in place.We live in an era were people recieve Achievement and Commendation medals just for PCSing or doing their job. People were flight suits who don't fly and Commanders get a Bronze Star with a V and never leave the base.Every single person in every single job doesn't need their own individual medal. There are enough already in place to recognize different levels of contribution and bravery in the face of combat or in support.While no one will ever dismiss the needed and important contributions of POGs and REMFs the fact remains that there is a monumental difference between the person who supports the warfighter and the warfighter himself. There is a huge gap in the hardship and sacrifice between the person with three hot meals a comfortable bed an M-16 and a PX within walking distance and the man who endures three months on a mountain
John, JBER
 
4/18/2013 7:32:54 PM ET
Just goes to show what happens to a poorly thought out idea by outgoing leadership. No one questioned the idea of the medal just its order of precedence. Did not expect a complete reversal. Given this medal was mocked earlier as the Digital Warfare Medal perhaps the device can be an N as in Nerd. And yet no Cold War Medal in sight.
JAFSO, Saddle Rock CO
 
4/18/2013 3:24:16 PM ET
Jon that is part of the issue of misinformation surrounding this dec. It was never intended as a freebie for all RPA operators it was designed to fill a specific gap for DFC-level achievement by RPA Cyber and other similar ops. RPA drivers already receive MSMs AFCOMs etc for meritorious service and are eligible for Air Medals and AAMs for achievement in flying ops. Compare the verbiage for criteria for the DFC to the proposed criteria for the DWM and you'll see what I mean.
Michael, NJ
 
4/17/2013 11:12:55 AM ET
I don't think the issue was ever that they created the medal it was where they put it in the order of precedence. I don't think anyone would have complained if it went where it belonged between the AF Good Conduct Medal and the AF Combat Readiness Medal. Even if they do get DFC's now it will still be a DFC with a Bronze Asterisk.
Jon, DMAFB
 
4/17/2013 10:01:06 AM ET
I'm grateful to those that served before me. I had the priviledge of serving our Nation for 33 years. Like most I've been over there and seen and felt the kinetic nature of combat seeing medals awarded to friends that I couldn't congratulate. I've also seen how a new dimension of combat has evolved where the kaboom is binary where the spoils are bits of information. Perhaps it's not too bad to acknowledge the importance of those contributions that make no noise.
DV, SAFB
 
4/16/2013 11:01:04 AM ET
So instead of receiving a DWM in lieu of a DFC we will award them the DFC with a device. I bet no one is happier about this outcome than RPA drivers and the efforts of all those organizations who wanted to 'preserve the stature of combat awards' by ensuring there wouldn't be a separate and clearly distinct decoration appears to have backfired.
Michael, NJ
 
4/16/2013 8:37:53 AM ET
What type of crack pot statement is that @Zach RAB 20 years of commission service and I have three AFCM.
Scott, Eglin
 
4/16/2013 8:30:12 AM ET
Thank goodness we are no longer going to decorate someone for the bravery of being out of range....as penned by Roger Waters.
ORF, Still Serving
 
4/16/2013 8:02:52 AM ET
medals that they otherwise might be eligible for simply did not recognize that kind of contribution. Because heaven forbid they give an officer a commendation medal.
Zach, RAB
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Through Airmen's Eyes: More than words: Airman shares passion for sign language  1

Eielson AFB youth show 'Purple Up' pride

Deployed service members observe Sexual Assault Awareness Month

Official discusses Transition Assistance Program at House hearing

SecAF: Hanscom enabling linked AF future

SecAF announces departure  2  |  VIDEO

Congress reviews Air Force's readiness at House hearing

Timbouktu and back: ANG med unit conducts 'irregular' operations

Through Airmen's Eyes: Thunderbirds crew chief takes to new heights  3

Academy cadets win NSA 'cyber defense' 2nd straight year

Air Force Week in Photos

Senior leaders testify on health of personnel programs  2

Through Airmen's Eyes: The walk toward flight  3

Affordability priority for F-35 program  5

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Challenging the status quo: Leadership in today's resource-constrained Air Force  3

Leadership not defined by shapes, sizes  10


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security & Policy     No Fear Act     E-publishing