Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > SecAF, CSAF share confidence in nuclear enterprise
 
Photos 
SecAF, CSAF share confidence in nuclear enterprise
(U.S. Air Force graphic/Corey Parrish)
Download HiRes
SecAF, CSAF share confidence in nuclear enterprise

Posted 5/10/2013 Email story   Print story

    


by Staff Sgt. David Salanitri
Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs


5/10/2013 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Appearing before the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Defense to testify about the service's fiscal 2014 budget request, Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley and Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Mark A. Welsh III also addressed Congressional concerns over media reports about the findings of a recent missile wing inspection.

The 91st Missile Wing at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., received an overall, passing "Satisfactory" rating during a Consolidated Unit Inspection by Air Force Global Strike Command, March 4 to13.

Twenty-two areas were inspected during the CUI, with the missile wing earning an "Outstanding" rating in one area, "Excellent" ratings in 14 areas, and "Satisfactory" ratings in six areas. One area was rated "Marginal."

Donley said the ICBM force, which maintains a high state of readiness as part of its mission, remains a safe, secure and reliable element of the nation's nuclear triad, and what was found represents the stronger inspection process the Air Force adopted as it reinvigorated the nuclear enterprise.

"We have made substantial progress in restoring the confidence, I think, of our entire [Department of Defense] and Congressional leadership in the Air Force's management of this important responsibility," Donley said. "It is a number one responsibility for our Air Force that we take very, very seriously."

As a result of the inspection and further review, unit leaders identified proficiency shortfalls compounded by an attitude of complacency among a small number of officers.
They sent a call-for-action email to missile crew members to re-emphasize the high standards expected in the nuclear mission area. It identified areas for improvement, outlined expectations, and reinforced pride and importance of the mission.

"I believe this is the kind of commander intervention that prevents the incidents that occurred in 2007," Welsh said. "They took very aggressive action early to make sure that there was no question in the minds of their crew force that marginal behavior or satisfactory-just-above-the-line was not acceptable."

The inspection also allowed the unit commanders to assess performance of the crew members to identify individuals that require more training. The 91st Operations Group identified 17 crew members who required more training--approximately five to six from each of the three missile squadrons.

Currently, the 17 officers identified are going through what Welsh described as a retraining program that should last roughly 60 days.

Welsh made it clear that he feels the marginal findings do not present a risk to the Air Force's nuclear mission, but are a result of identifying a potential problem before it has the ability to snowball -- the exact reason the Air Force has inspections. The service uses assessments and inspections as tools for commanders to assess people, processes and performance.

"I don't believe we have a nuclear surety risk at Minot Air Force Base," Welsh said. "I believe we have commanders who are taking very aggressive action to ensure that never occurs. And in that respect, this is a good thing."

Talking about the Airmen who perform the nuclear deterrence mission, Welsh reaffirmed his confidence in them.

"Their performance is really exceptional day-to-day ... it has to be. There is no other option," he said. "And I think our commitment is that we make sure we keep that motivation as they move up through the ranks, and make sure they understand that the Air Force recognizes it."



tabComments
5/17/2013 12:58:49 PM ET
Minot has not been doing well for a very long time. We have been held accountable to the person who said we are not held to a higher standard. Being from Minot we have lost several commanders and everytime a mishap occurs we all lose a little more faith. However the men and women from Minot do an outstanding job only the few mess it up for the rest of us. -Why not Minot
MM3 X3, VAFB
 
5/15/2013 8:22:51 AM ET
Paging General Selmon Sundown Wells.
Dean Vinson, Ohio
 
5/14/2013 11:17:52 PM ET
Realistic you are spot on. Another issue is the leadership by email approach in todays AF. Would be nice to expose these crews to the blunt in your face leadership style we enjoyed in SAC. If the attitudes of these 17 young officers cannot be reversed they should be shown the door. Service is a privilege not an entitlement.
JAFSO, Saddle Rock CO
 
5/14/2013 4:47:30 PM ET
How do you not know how to push a red button
Sgt whoever, conus
 
5/14/2013 3:24:45 PM ET
In the Navy if a ship runs aground the CNO removes the commander. This is worse than a ship running aground and yet the commander is still there DMPI is correct this is a lack of leadership. The commanders are responsible. When is accountability going to come to the Air Force
Jerry, Navy
 
5/14/2013 9:08:48 AM ET
Former SAC JD JYD great comments. Training or more precisely a lack of proper training in the wing is only a symptom not the real problem. The real problem is a lack of involved leadership. It's obvious that the wing group and squadron leaders were not aware that 10 percent of their officers were unprepared until the inspectors pointed them out. The post-inspection call-for-action E-mail was way too late. You can bet that every other nuclear unit is looking really hard at their own programs now. The worst mistake is not learning from others' mistakes.
DMPI, Arlington VA
 
5/13/2013 2:39:44 PM ET
The real problem is that it took a less than stellar inspection to find out a large number of crewmembers were not doing a good job. This should have shown up for months during monthly testing monthly training sessions annual certifications and oversight by commanders. It appears part of the problem is in training and evaluation. The crews are not being objectively graded and the results are inflated. That is until an outside observer takes a look. I would be looking at training and see if it needs to be upgraded and a change in philosophy.
Former SAC, USA
 
5/13/2013 1:02:48 PM ET
This never would have happened when SAC was in control. I sure wouldn't want to be OIC who briefed General Lemay on this. Could you just imagine
JYD, Robins AFB
 
5/13/2013 8:34:59 AM ET
As former missile launch officer I am glad they have confidence in the nuclear enterprise. I certainly don't. The force has become way too lax and matter of fact. Where is SAC when you need it
JD, Oklahoma
 
5/12/2013 8:25:13 AM ET
There is only one person who needs to be brought up on charges for this situation. The person who forwarded that e-mail to the Associated Press needs to face a court martial. Expedient and decisive action on the part of military leaders is what prevents serious problems. I give kudos to the leaders at this unit who have the courage to take action instead of taking the approach that SATISFACTORY is good enough. I have been in many units that would have taken an inspection with only one MARGINAL rating as a successful one. Most in this nation will not realize the blanket of protection that these warriors provide until -- God forbid -- it is gone. And then it will be too late.
Realistic, Remote
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Alert Reaper Airmen find IED

Luke AFB F-16 crashes, pilots safely eject  1

AF drops 50,000 plus gallons of retardant on Colorado fires

352nd SOG welcomes Osprey to fleet

SecDef: DOD welcomes Supreme Court decision  29

Weather warns warriors, saves services silver

Squadron's lone female gunner aims high  1

Flight engineer reaches combat sortie milestone  3

Training helps deployed Airman save lives  1

Acting SecAF recounts journey to equality  6

Civil engineers recall, reflect 17 years after Khobar Towers bombing  1

Air Force selects 5,654 for technical sergeant  2

Aerial firefighting continues against Rocky Mountain fires

Through Airmen's Eyes: One Airman's journey to a brighter future  5

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Our commitment, our community

'Lucky' people take personal responsibility for their own success  11


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention      Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention     FOIA     IG   EEO