Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Panel recommends ways to improve military diversity
 
Related Links
 Final Report: From Representation to Inclusion
 Military Leadership Diversity Commission
 Retired Gen. Lester L. Lyles
 Retired Lt. Gen. Julius W. Becton Jr.
Panel recommends ways to improve military diversity

Posted 3/8/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Lisa Daniel
American Forces Press Service


3/8/2011 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- A commission created to improve diversity among military leaders has issued 20 recommendations its members say will make the military better reflect the composition of the United States in its ranks.

The Military Leadership Diversity Commission, created as part of the 2009 National Defense Authorization Act, issued the findings of its 18-month research March 7, with recommendations for how Defense Department oofficials can improve the promotion of women and minorities at a time when the nation is expected to become increasingly diverse.

"The armed forces have not yet succeeded in developing a continuing stream of leaders who are as demographically diverse as the nation they serve," the report says.

The disparity between the numbers of racial and ethnic minorities in the military and their leaders "will become starkly obvious without the successful recruitment, promotion and retention of racial/ethnic minorities among the enlisted force," the report says. "Without sustained attention, this problem will only become more acute as the ... makeup of the United States continues to change."

The commission's chairman, retired Air Force Gen. Lester L. Lyles, said that while the military is free of the institutional biases of decades past, it retains the appearance of bias because so few women and minorities occupy senior positions.

"There are no institutional biases in the United States military today, ... and probably have not been for many, many years," General Lyles said. "But there are some people who think there are, because when you look statistically at the demographics in the United States, and you look at the demographics in the military, then you look at the senior leadership positions, both in officer and senior enlisted ranks, to some it may give the appearance that there are biases that prevented women and minorities from achieving those senior ranks."

The commission found four reasons for low representation of women and minorities in senior military positions:

-- Low representation of women and minorities in initial officer accessions;

-- Lower representation of women and minority officers in career fields associated with higher officer rank;

-- Lower retention of midlevel female service members; and

-- Lower rates of advancement among female and minority officers.

"Our recommendations were to ensure we remove any potential barriers that exist today; that we make recommendations that enhance the culture, career progression and recruiting (of women and minorities); and that we grow the pool of eligible candidates," General Lyles said.

The commission recommends that the services consider commitment to diversity in officer promotions and require diversity leadership education and training at all levels.

To further promote diversity, the services must increase their pool of eligible recruits and officer candidates, the report says. Pentagon statistics show that three out of four Americans between the ages of 17 and 24 are not eligible to enlist because of low education or test scores, past criminal history or because they can't meet health and fitness requirements.

"This is a national security issue requiring the attention and collected effort of top public officials," the commission's report says.

The commission also recommended a new, broader definition of "diversity" that would add backgrounds and skills largely missing from today's military, such as recruiting people from more varied regions and cultural backgrounds and with foreign-language skills and higher math, science and technological abilities.

"Diversity is all the different characteristics and attributes of individuals that are consistent with Department of Defense core values, integral to overall readiness and mission accomplishment and reflective of the nation we serve," the report says.

Retired Army Lt. Gen. Julius W. Becton Jr., the commission's vice chair, said the military's needs in recruiting and retaining the right people must start much earlier than at the end of high school.

"Unless we start at the pre-kindergarten level, we're never going to increase how many kids are graduating and going to college," said General Becton , a former college president and superintendent of Washington, D.C., public schools. Issues such as full-day kindergarten, summer school and lengthening the hours American children spend in school all have an impact on the military, he said.

Such steps are important, General Becton said, to ensure that potential recruits can meet military standards. Nothing the commission has recommended calls for lowering standards, he added.

"There are no efforts whatsoever to decrease standards," he said. "The standards are proven, and we want people to come up to the standards."

The commission also recommended that the Pentagon lift its ban on assigning women to ground combat units below the brigade level, citing the policy as a barrier to women attaining the military's most-senior ranks.

Pentagon spokeswoman Eileen Lainez said Defense Department officials will evaluate the panel's recommendations as part of an ongoing review of diversity policies.



tabComments
8/14/2011 3:59:05 AM ET
This shouldn't be a secret to anyone. The Army already has race/gender quotas for it's officer promotions. Merit is put second. How are soldiers to look at their officer's in charge and wonder if they are qualified or an affirmative action selection. This program is going to do more harm than good in the long run.
CC, deployed
 
4/14/2011 9:29:30 AM ET
I am Hispanic born in a Spanish speaking country and I just want to tell you my experience. I can be in a job working as hard as I can doing my best. My white boss may think I am not doing a good job. However a white Captain may come and perform exact same as I was doing then that Captain is doing great job. How do you call that? How can I prove I have been discriminated against? I agree that we should be evaluated based on our performance but how can you promote to a higher rank when you are being hindered if you do not want to call that discrimination? I am sure you cannot see through your eyes what I feel and you may think that the Air Force has a diverse force when, in reality, has not. Here is a question for you - how many generals do we currently have with a Hispanic last name? I am sure you will have to search because it won't be easy to find. I think we need to enforce a diverse force free of discrimination.
Capt M, Kadena
 
3/14/2011 12:53:29 PM ET
Like most of the commenters on here I have nothing against diversity so long as we do not descend into ugly things like race-based quotas racial preferences etc. The problem I have with the pro-diversity crowd is that they act as if having military demographics match up exactly with the country's demographics is a self-evident necessity. Nobody seems to stop and ask if this is even a valid assumption. Anybody who has studied these issues knows that women generally tend to choose careers that offer fewer and more flexible hours. They also take more time out of the work force. There is a very simple explanation for this phenomenon WOMEN HAVE BABIES This is the main cause of the so-called gender wage gap not discrimination.
Jess, Melbourne FL
 
3/10/2011 3:32:13 PM ET
I agree with some of the points mentioned by Capt S. The problem is this is a zero sum equation. Additional opportunity for promotion for one person is subtracted from someone else. In your idea two Captains up for promotion to Major and if all else is the same the Captain who is black should be promoted before the Captain who is white. This certainly helps the one but it also certainly hurts the other. If everyone could be promoted it would not be a problem. But there are only a certain number of promotions available. Any method of promotion that looks at additional factors such as race or gender fairly or unfairly provides preferential treatment for one group to the disadvantage of another group. This will also lead to resentment of and questions regarding the promotion process.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
3/10/2011 1:40:07 PM ET
Current senior leaders first joined the military 20 or 30 years ago. To get a good statistical understanding of promotions in general and with a particuar subgroup, one has to look at comparable attributes. In other words, if there aren't more black women colonels and above today, you first need to look at how many black women officers joined 20-30 years ago, not compare it with the demographics today.
Sgt Whoever, conus
 
3/10/2011 12:07:50 PM ET
I agree with the majority on this post we should just recruit and promote the best individuals. The vast majority of the military could care less what your race/ color/ religion/ sex/ or national origin is and they rate and promote individuals based on their performance. The post said they would not lower standards; what it doesn't say is that they would always recruit the best regardless of race/ color/ religion/ sex/ or national origin. And it is a shame if we pass up anybody who has outstanding qualifications to recruit or promote somebody in an underrepresented group who just qualifies. Heck, I don't even think there is a need for Affirmative Action anymore; society as a whole has improved leaps and bounds since Affirmative Action was enacted.
Retired, GA
 
3/10/2011 12:02:49 PM ET
@Capt S - as mentioned below our president and commander in chief is black. I think the issues with gross inequalities are a thing of the past. I'm not saying inequalities don't exist but that we need to stop leaning on the crutch of what the man did decades ago. I worked my butt off to get where I am today and had absoultely nothing given to me that I did not earn based on my hard work and performace not my color or gender.
RMA, SA
 
3/10/2011 11:47:21 AM ET
Playing devils advocate but I think it shines true light on the issue. A recent radio show was discussing the racial issue in our country with regards to social disparity between whites and blacks in terms of slavery earnings, employment opportunities for advancement, etc. Both white and black callers responded to the radio hosts discussion and two prominent views came to light. First in reference to slavery, white man placed blacks in that position to begin with. Because of this dark past, white man feels obligated to help those that they suppressed. The flip side of this the second view, blacks must take the opportunities presented to them to better themselves and their lives and must pass on this mentality to the next generation, but are not doing so within their society. Something to consider.
Steve, Tampa
 
3/10/2011 9:38:28 AM ET
Really, RMA. If you were born black, you'd be statistically more likely to grow up in a poorer family in a worse neighborhood with more crime, go to worse schools, have a harder time getting a job and generally have a more difficult time than if you were born white. The various scholarships and opportunities exist to offset this gross inequality that still exists today. Yes, there are poor whites and rich blacks but blacks and other minorities are still disproportianately less well off than whites. I'm not saying there's anything wrong with being a white male. Just that you should realize that you probably had some significant advantages due to your skin color and gender that aren't immediately obvious.
Capt S, Missouri
 
3/10/2011 4:45:21 AM ET
This is easy. All they need to do is add boxes on the front of the OPR/EPR for race and gender. That way they can decide exactly who to promote based on what the Diversity Commission feels we need rather than on individual merit. I guess I need another CBT to correct my attitude.
Thomas, Florida
 
3/10/2011 12:26:09 AM ET
The Commander-in-Chief is black. Just pointing out the obvious. Did he get graded on a curve? Secretary of state is a woman. Maybe I missed something but what is compelling the need for the military to reflect the demographics of the country? This an an all-volunteer force. The promotion systems even the playing field, right? I thought the concept of the bell curve was debunked. Is this article saying we are not necessarily going to promote the most qualified people? As soon as public law is passed mandating our civilian government also be required to demographically mirror our society, this shouldn't even be a discussion. National security? Integrity last.
Scott, Seattle
 
3/9/2011 10:13:12 PM ET
Capt S-- you have no earthly idea how hard I, the individual, had to work to get to where I am. The bottom line is that discriminating against one group of people to promote expanded opportunities for another group is wrong. We preach EQUAL OPPORTUNITY so how about we actually practice it!
Maj, overseas
 
3/9/2011 3:49:31 PM ET
@Capt S - Really? The assumption you are making is that a black female officer had to work harder to get promoted than a while male. In this day and age, it's the other way around. As a white male I was not afforded access to many assistance programs offered to other races/genders. No one offered me scholarships, loans, grants, etc., because of my race and gender. I attest that white males have to work just as hard or even harder to advance these days.
RMA, SA
 
3/9/2011 3:46:27 PM ET
I think this statement says it all To further promote diversity the services must increase their pool of eligible recruits and officer candidates the report says. Pentagon statistics show that three out of four Americans between the ages of 17 and 24 are not eligible to enlist because of low education or test scores past criminal history or because they can't meet health and fitness requirements. So we already know that most folks in the age category we want are ineligible...how are we going to change that? The report says we won't lower our standards. So how do you make someone eligible who can't meet the standards...YOU DON'T! It is 2011...time for all of us to be recruited/ promoted/ retained on our own merit and accomplishments...not just to meet a desired demographic.
CHief Y, Alabama
 
3/9/2011 3:12:14 PM ET
Funny, last time I took a WAPS promotion test there was no box to check for race or gender. So it seems to me that the enlisted side IS merit-based. Officer promotions are a different can of soup though.
PB, US
 
3/9/2011 2:13:26 PM ET
Recommendation number one: get rid of pointless diversity panels that are created only to promote advancement of a single demographic. All this does is support affirmative action efforts which doesn't promote based on merit. How about creating an excellence in leadership panel to find out the reason for all non-selects not just a single group. You can target the entire force that way and focus on priority areas not simply because they are women or minorities. I think you will find out that with few exceptions, most non-selects in all categories of race and gender are simply substandard performers compared to their peers.
SW, OK
 
3/9/2011 1:01:54 PM ET
I believe this is a complete waste of time on two grounds. First the military has and will continue to be a male dominated service due the nature of the business. This does not mean women are unable to handle it, they just handle it differently than men i.e.psychologically and emotionally. Secondly as this article pointed out society itself has to change in regards to diversity. Just look at current debated/contested issues with females in combat to homosexuality to immigration. In my opinion the military is about as diverse as its going to get. The issue is and should not be about getting people in its keeping them in. This is what diversity should be based on keeping the best of the minoritiesfemales in the service rather than losing them to competitive civilian sector.
Steve, Tampa
 
3/9/2011 12:49:38 PM ET
A portion of this report is correct it does need to start earlier but not with the government supported system with the parents. Yes it takes a village to raise a child but as the parent you must do your part. We have brought degenerates into the military and changed them but they started at a baseline. Our values and core values are not that of the public we serve...and we should not reduce our standard. Demographics mean very little in this case. recruit retain and promote the best. if you don't you will damage our military society for ever.
John, MO
 
3/9/2011 11:18:37 AM ET
The article says that The commission also recommended a new broader definition of diversity that would add backgrounds and skills largely missing from today's military such as recruiting people from more varied regions and cultural backgrounds and with foreign-language skills and higher math science and technological abilities.What backgrounds and skills are currently missing from today's military? Have the recruiters failed I don't think so. This is Orwellian.
Brandon, Florida
 
3/9/2011 10:15:45 AM ET
Maj try putting yourself in the shoes of a black female officer. Chances are you would have had to work a lot harder over the course of your lifetime to get to where you are now. How would you feel if you were treated exactly the same as a white male officer who probably didn't have to work half as hard as you did
Capt S, Missouri
 
3/9/2011 9:37:01 AM ET
BLUF They want to start lowering the bar so we start looking more like society. I'm all for diversity its been a strength of the military and this country for decades but we can't start sacrificing merit at the alter of diversity. I've seen the promotion board process and no where does race or gender play a role. You don't have a bunch of white males in the room making the decisions the board is usually very diverse as well. I'm with Jerry focus on merit and performance. Plus does anyone feel like they need even more diversity training? Not me......
RMA, SA
 
3/9/2011 9:08:49 AM ET
@ Jerry - why just the best? Everyone who has taken the step to join the military in my book is already the best. My brother's friend who was a heavy drinker and smoker weighing at 200 pounds, 5'8 joined the Air Force. Within 6 months he had already lost 35 pounds, quit drinking and smoking altogether and is now about to make technical sergeant. He was a low-life with a bad attitude and now look at where he is. A totally different person. He was not the first and will certainly not be the last person who is a scum bag turned good the military will recruit. Think about it Mr. Cribbs.
Louis, ok
 
3/9/2011 4:01:03 AM ET
Jerry from Oklahoma is spot on. Until we as a society and military stop basing promotions and such on anything other than merit it will never work. How about a person just being a person? You can make the demographic argument for any race or gender based on career field. Do the math by career field and then report the numbers. Again, until equal opportunity is based on merit it will never be equal.
Dave , Korea
 
3/8/2011 11:31:59 PM ET
As a white male officer I can see the writing on the wall. I now fully understand that with all else being equal that my skin color or gender alone may disqualify me from advancement. Seems we have learned nothing from MLK.
Maj, overseas
 
3/8/2011 4:39:22 PM ET
Just recruit and promote the best INDIVIDUALS. There shouldn't be any regard to race, sex, religion, or any other self-identifying label. The military should ONLY be concerned with who can best do the job.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
3/8/2011 3:28:44 PM ET
Can someone please tell me how diversity in the military is a National Security Issue?
Mike, Florida
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
New training facility opens in Wyoming

Solar power lights up Southwest Asia

Separate paths bring brothers together for Christmas  1

All I want for Christmas ... Daddy!

Osan community brightens holidays for Korean orphans  |  VIDEO

Deployed Airman receives Christmas phone call from President Obama

Air Force Week in Photos

Premier AF concert band 'wows' fellow musicians at Midwest Clinic  11

Pararescue, security forces Airmen train as one  10

Through Airmen's Eyes: High school reunion ... above Afghanistan

Space Fence program moves forward  1

Kunsan AB, Hurlburt Field Airmen unite to spread holiday cheer

Operation Christmas Drop  1

Air Force Week in Photos

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Legacy of valor  1

There IS an I in team  3


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing