Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Air Force officials outline efficiencies processes
 
Photos 
(U.S. Air Force graphic)
(U.S. Air Force graphic)
Download HiRes
 
Related Biographies
 
  DAVID TILLOTSON III
Air Force officials outline efficiencies processes

Posted 3/30/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Master Sgt. Amaani Lyle
Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs


3/30/2011 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- In compliance with Department of Defense efficiency guidance, Air Force officials confirmed plans here March 29 to implement fiscal 2012 budget proposals that shift dollars and people from overhead and support functions to modernization and warfighting areas.

During testimony to members of the Readiness and Management Support Subcommittee of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Undersecretary of the Air Force Erin Conaton said Air Force officials have worked hard to meet the efficiencies targets established by DOD guidelines and are reviewing their processes from top to bottom.

"We looked at all categories of support activities from installations to sustainment to acquisition overhead," Conaton said. "We also looked at how we do business and areas where we changed our business process to become more efficient."

The undersecretary said she and her team will continue to examine strategies to accomplish the Air Force's portion of the DOD's approximately $100 billion in efficiency targets and to report on progress to senior leaders.

In a separate interview, David Tillotson III, the director of the Air Force Office of Business Transformation, provided further details on Air Force efficiencies efforts.

"The Air Force efficiencies goal is $33.3 billion over the next 5-6 years," he said. "The action is to find things we can do more efficiently that allow us to move resources from support to mission-critical activities."

Tillotson explained that the service also will analyze support and services functions to see if they can be performed differently or discarded altogether.

The concept, according to Tillotson, is not new to the Air Force. In recent years, officials consolidated manpower and personnel, finance management and other functional organizations. These consolidations enabled swifter growth of such programs as intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance and remotely piloted aircraft to meet combatant commanders' demand.

"Because seeking and finding these efficiencies kept us from having to reduce modernization programs to pay corporate bills, we were able to preserve ongoing investments such as the production capacities on the MQ-9 Reaper, an essential Joint warfighter need," he said.

Air Force officials plan to reduce information technology infrastructure costs by 25 percent over the future years defense program as another of the efficiency initiatives.

"We intend to consolidate data centers and telephone switch operations and find more effective ways to deploy computer systems using commercial standard models," Tillotson said. "This will result in less cost of hardware and contractors who support those activities and reduce the amount of work currently done manually."

In the areas of fuel and energy efficiency, Tillotson lauded Air Mobility Command leaders for making great strides in better flight and mission load planning.

"AMC demonstrates what we can do to reduce the consumption of energy and still achieve the mission," he said. "The result is they get more delivery per gallon of fuel expended than they have in the past, and that's one of the efficiency areas we're seeking to achieve."

Tillotson noted the Air Force's new energy standards would also allow installation buildings to be more efficiently run and feature better insulation, heating and cooling systems.

"These are but a few ways that we can reduce the overall consumption of energy at a facility level," he said.

Airmen, he added, play a critical ongoing role in identifying the Air Force's efficiencies.

"Airmen who have good ideas about better ways to do things should participate in programs by which they can put forth efficiencies recommendations," he said, highlighting the Air Force Innovative Development through Employee Awareness, or IDEA, program as one such avenue to share process improvements.

By the same token, Air Force leaders may require Airmen of all grades to adjust to efficiency challenges by embracing new business procedures and practices.

"I would encourage people to take an open mind to the possibility of needing a new skill set in a new location, since part of efficiencies involves considering whether Airmen and civilians are doing the kind of work we need them to do," Tillotson said.

Tillotson asserts the need for change and prioritization is as much an issue of national security as financial security. In light of the ever-widening deficit, the interest alone on such debt affects money in the national budget, he added.

"It's the taxpayer's money; we should spend it well, and wisely," he said. "The nation needs us to get the most we can out of every dollar with which we're entrusted."



tabComments
6/1/2011 12:17:51 PM ET
Manpower and Personnel never merged. Ok, they're in the same flight but they have different skill sets, different processes, different systems, and no efficiencies were ever realized nor manpower cut. Still stovepiped due to maintaining two different systems.
Reality Check, Stateside
 
4/1/2011 2:13:52 PM ET
We over regulate ourselves to the point of not being able to legally perform our duties.
MSgt H, Hill AFB
 
4/1/2011 11:24:49 AM ET
MSgt F I agree with you completely. The majority of my time is spent ensuring our dozens of additional duties and programs are in compliance. Many of which have nothing to do with our mission and pull from multiple forms and levels of instruction. It's exhausting. Meanwhile the knowledge of my actual mission suffers. We need to realize wnat's really important. It's like we exist to sustain our existence.
1Lt, Florida
 
4/1/2011 9:53:29 AM ET
If you want efficency to increase you have to go through the pain to make that happen. This requires tiger teams at every base of FM folks who go into every shop at the lowest level getting the shop to provide a list of everything they purchased over the last 2 years and createing a budget at that level - shop, flight, Squadron, Group and wing. Basically you would have Resource Advisors auditing the shops spending habits to give a true budget number needed. Currently we have unskilled folks performing cost estimations that are being passed back through the current structure which gives us inflated budget numbers.
Brian, Moody AFB
 
4/1/2011 7:27:38 AM ET
To DCMD - if you are going to make such an ignorant comment at least have the intestinal fortitude to put your name to it.
SMSgt. Michael Zimmerman, Niagara Falls ARS NY
 
4/1/2011 4:32:39 AM ET
MSgt F hit the nail on the head. Everytime we turn around we have to reinvent the wheel because of policy change. Stick with the basics and we will be more efficient.
concerned NCO, out west
 
3/31/2011 4:33:00 PM ET
It's all smoke and mirrors. Requests, results, budgets and data get twisted-morphed-inflated as they move from one level of bureaucracy up to the next. No officer wants to admit that their pet project is garbage and should be scrapped. It's the same in every program and every organization. There are too many self licking ice cream cones the Air Force has no real hope for real efficiency improvements.
Sgt Whoever, conus
 
3/31/2011 4:15:25 PM ET
Hey DC - your disdain for Career Enlisted Aviators is plain to see. Most pilots that fly on crew aircraft come to appreciate and respect the hard work we all do. I am not a load master but an Aerial Gunner Instructor on CSAR helicopters. And, no, I don't serve coffee to the pilot. Come on out here to the schoolhouse anytime and I will gladly give you some more perspective on exactly what us Career Enlisted Aviators do. I can assure you that after one flight with a guy like me you would keep your snide and disaparaging remarks to yourself and probably be a little more humble.
AirGunner, Kirtland AFB
 
3/31/2011 2:40:57 PM ET
The Air Force is a ball of inefficiencies that cant' seem to find its own identity. Were pretty much killing ourselves with AFIs/instructions/policies. One quick publishing search found 3470 AFIs and 1025 AF Manuals. This information overload is just a drop in the bucket. This does not include Command/Wing/Base/Group/Squadron supplements policies or instructions. We often have multiple sources of conflicting guidance for the same thing. We just need to get back to the basics instead of adding to the quagmire of policy and training we already have.
MSgt F, Hill
 
3/31/2011 1:13:25 PM ET
The pilot earning 151961.73 is entirely responsible for the safe operation of a multi-million dollar machine. The loadmaster is there to serve coffee to said pilot.
DC, MD
 
3/31/2011 12:40:54 PM ET
If you want to save money bring back the enlisted pilot program. There is no reason why a pilot needs to be an officer. Besides most Air Force pilots have degrees in the arts - i.e. English History. An Air Force Major with two kids and 14 years of service plus the flying bonus 25k per year stationed at Elmendorf AFB is bringing home 151961.73 to fly a C-130. The Loadmaster in the back brings home 45000.00. Where is the outrage?
BPL, East Hartford CT
 
3/31/2011 12:19:44 PM ET
Everybody is always saying be more efficient. Cut unnecessary programs and overhead. What they really mean is cut someone elses programs and overhead. One easy cut that would be shared by everyone is to cancel EVERY annual conference. Require the sponsors of the annual conferences justify their existence and, if justified, then they would also need to justify why they couldn't be moved to every other year.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
3/31/2011 7:42:04 AM ET
We all here about efficiencies but it is hard to take thing seriously when the Air Force leadership still is sending people to conferences, as examples - Chaplin Conference, ASMC PDI for FM types, the conference they had for the women in San Diego, PHMA for Housing types when we don't even own the houses anymore in the states. In addition, why not look at mandatory same CWS day to close a stateside base down 1 day every two weeks to save energy cost for the AF and the member. The leadership does not support telework either the old mentality of most be seen to be accounted for is still in place. The other thing is dont pull the funds until the efficiencies are in place.
Dino, US
 
3/31/2011 6:50:46 AM ET
Haven't we already been doing this for the last 10 years in the Do More With Less gameplan?
DSW, WR GA
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
New training facility opens in Wyoming

Solar power lights up Southwest Asia

Separate paths bring brothers together for Christmas  1

All I want for Christmas ... Daddy!

Osan community brightens holidays for Korean orphans  |  VIDEO

Deployed Airman receives Christmas phone call from President Obama

Air Force Week in Photos

Premier AF concert band 'wows' fellow musicians at Midwest Clinic  11

Pararescue, security forces Airmen train as one  10

Through Airmen's Eyes: High school reunion ... above Afghanistan

Space Fence program moves forward  1

Kunsan AB, Hurlburt Field Airmen unite to spread holiday cheer

Operation Christmas Drop  1

Air Force Week in Photos

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Legacy of valor  1

There IS an I in team  3


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing