Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Force management explained
Force management explained

Posted 5/10/2011 Email story   Print story

    


by Monica Mendoza
21st Space Wing Public Affairs


5/10/2011 - PETERSON AIR FORCE BASE, Colo. (AFNS) -- A group of mostly captains sat in on a recent briefing here to find out more about the 2011 Force Management Program.

In February, Air Force leaders announced another round of involuntary force-management programs to reduce personnel, and this time it affects mostly officers.

For some of the officers, it was not the first time they sat in such a briefing. Some of the captains have faced this proposal before.

Though the numbers are in their favor -- 300 out of 9,000 officers, or 5 percent, will be let go -- some said it's still nerve racking.

"Even though it is the bottom 5 percent that is being cut, everyone is going to worry when their career is on the line and they are not in charge of it," said 1st Lt. Alyssa Tetrault, the military personnel section chief here.

In February, Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz said the Air Force ended fiscal year 2010 with 2,300 officers above end strength, or the congressionally mandated ceiling, and had one of the highest retention levels in 16 years. Those two factors combined led to this round of the Force Management Program.

There are two programs in play: the force shaping board and the reduction in force board. Both aim to shape the size of the force but, affect different groups.

For junior officers, the plan includes force-shaping boards beginning in May. The FSB will consider year groups with excess officers in the judge advocate general corps, and affects officers in the 2006 to 2008 commissioned year groups.

Captains and majors will face the RIF.

-- Captains: line of the Air Force 2003 through 2005
-- Majors: line of the Air Force 2000; line of the Air Force-J 2001-2003
-- Biomedical service corps: 2000 and 2001

Results are expected to be published in November, and the mandatory date for separation for those not retained is Feb. 1, 2012.

Now is the time for officers to prepare letters to the board if they desire, Lieutenant Tetrault said.

Those facing FSB must submit letters by May 8. Those facing RIF must submit letters by Sept. 18.

Airmen can find out more about the letters in the Personnel Services Delivery Memorandum, No. 11-12, on the Air Force Personnel Center website.

"(The PSDM) tells them everything they need to know about letters to the board and where to send them, who to contact if they have questions," she said.

Since the February announcement of the 2011 Force Management Program, there have been some changes to year groups and categories.

Lieutenant Tetrault said she encourages Airmen to read the PSDM and "take an active role in your career."

She said it is important that RIF-eligible officers ensure their records are current, particularly with regard to duty history, appropriate professional military education and advanced academic degrees.

By August, officers should know where they stand, Lieutenant Tetrault said. Those traditional line officers eligible for force reduction will know if they have been rated as "definitely retain," "retain," or "do not retain."

RIF-eligible officers need to make plans just in case, said Sherri Kitchens, the transition assistance program manager.

She said those officers should consider a pre-separation counseling brief offered at the Airman and Family Readiness Center.

"That is the first transition service that we offer," Ms. Kitchens said. "We welcome you at two years out of your date of separation. Even if you are just thinking about separation, we would love to have you. It does not obligate you in any way and it does not affect personnel records."



tabComments
5/13/2011 6:13:59 PM ET
The Air Force should cut missions since it's cutting so many people. This "do more with less" stuff is breaking the Air Force. On top of a 50-hour-a-week primary duty, everyone needs to be a gym rat, personnelist and finance expert.
Tired, At work
 
5/13/2011 3:46:28 PM ET
@Travis, if a weak link means being disappointed that we continue to cut people who want to serve the USAF, then I AM GUILTY. If a weak link means sweating through my own FSB and RIF board while watching peers being handed their pink slip, then I AM GUILTY. If a weak link means wondering how we can inform members their service will no longer be needed while they are deployed, then I AM GUILTY. You are correct that not every officer will be stratified on his or her OPR, however anyone meeting a promotion board, FSB, RIF,SERB, PME, or command will be racked and stacked, thus receive a ranking order. Apparently I must justify my current status. My PRF has been completed. I have always been stratified in the top 10 percent and will not meet this years RIF. @J, it pains me to read this about your community but you're not alone in this plight. I wish those meeting the board this year the best of luck.
Quentin, Germany
 
5/12/2011 11:26:58 AM ET
The numbers don't come from across all AFSCs, either. Between 2007 and the last couple of years, the chemist career field lost most of its people, regardless of their performance.
J, FL
 
5/12/2011 9:27:16 AM ET
PB, these are definitely not official PSDM messages. They are news stories like any other that you see in the media. Potentially with lots of factual errors. Don't rely on these for your source of information. Quentin, you need to read what you wrote. If you're at the bottom and you work with superstars, THEN you are the weakest link and strated accordingly. Your idea that everybody gets a strat is wrong.
Travis, Eglin AFB
 
5/12/2011 9:27:14 AM ET
They changed the numbers in the article ... wonderful. It used to read 300 of 9,500 or 2 percent; now it reads 300 of 9,000 or 5 percent. The math is wrong in both. PB, what do you think of af.mil as an official source of information now? It is not official unless it comes through message traffic from personnel to the commander. This is pitiful.
Bob, FL
 
5/11/2011 3:09:30 PM ET
Control who writes your recommendation form. Never PCSPCA right before an accounting date or chance being shuffle to the bottom of another Senior Rater's pile. If you work in a joint environment ensure Senior Raters from other services understand Air Force writing and the importance of strats. If you are strated 11 your previous strats DE AE positions decorations should support your past performance. You are in control and it is competitive it has always been that way.
Max , Alabama
 
5/11/2011 11:57:53 AM ET
Bob youre obviously living in a perfect world. Unfortunately Ive put together ROPs and reviewed OPRs written by Joint CCs in my previous jobs. The words theyve put on paper have unintentionally sealed the fate of officers meeting the FSB and RIF board. To get the big picture a Senior Rater will stratify a new officer based on whats already been written on their last 2 to 3 OPRs. It normally takes 5 OPRs on top to bury 1 poorly written OPR. A strat wont help much if youre the only officer in your peer group. If youre a new officer surrounded by superstars youll probably have to wait your turn to get a good strat or not be stratified at all. I dont believe life is always fair but the bottom 5 percent isnt the bottom performers. The 300 vacancies will soon have names and many will be surprised.
Quentin, Germany
 
5/11/2011 9:08:35 AM ET
Just looking at the numbers this does not seem to be cost effective at all and the numbers dont seem to add up. According to the article the Air Force is above end strength by 2300 officers and yet only 300 out of a possible 9500 officers being looked at will be let go. Where do the other 2000 come from Maybe letting go 2 percent of the general officers Also what will be the cost of reviewing the 9500 officer personnel files and convening the boards Take that amount of money and divide it between the numbers of officers let go and I am sure you will find it will cost more than it would to have kept them. Also then take that same amount of money and divide it between the 300 officers and let them divide it between themselves and you might find 300 officers who would take this windfall and leave. The reason is it will cost a HUGE amount of money to conduct these boards.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
5/10/2011 5:32:04 PM ET
Bob, news stories posted to af.mil ARE official messages as surely as if they were typed out on letterhead. While Ms. Mendoza doesn't explicitly cite where she got the number, it almost certainly came from the folks at the Air Force Personnel Center.
PB, US
 
5/10/2011 2:28:27 PM ET
There needs to be more force shaping. Get rid of Numbered Air Forces and the general officers and support staff that go with them. Cut the number of ROTC programs so there are fewer officers in the incoming classes. Stop the retention bonuses and require longer commitments to start with in pilot career fields. There are a number of solutions to the problem of force shaping so the Air Force doesn't have to go through this every couple of years.
Jerry, Oklahoma
 
5/10/2011 1:52:55 PM ET
The title should read partially explained. Lt Cols and Cols were told months ago there would be a SERB this year and that additional information should be forthcoming by April. I'm not as upset by the fact that I may be SERBed as I am by the lack of communication by leadership. How about letting us know what the plan is
Paul, Moron AB Spain
 
5/10/2011 12:14:59 PM ET
I have to partially disagree with you Bob. I agree that the individual is in charge of many elements of his or her own career but just because I write my own OPR and hand it to an Army commander doesn't mean he or she will use it. Fortunately, over the past 5 years or so, the gap in what each service believes is of value in a service member is closing. However in my time as a young officer I did work for civilians and officers of other services who were arrogant enough to have NEVER accepted my input into my performance report.
Chris Kimball, Louisiana
 
5/10/2011 8:06:26 AM ET
First, where are these numbers coming from? 300 of 9500 will be let go... but where's the source for that? If these are the real numbers put them in an official message rather than posting to af.mil. What percent will get def retain? Second, Quentin, you are in charge of your career. If you have a Joint CC, write your PRF and/or find an AF mentor.
Bob, FL
 
5/9/2011 7:39:21 AM ET
You can trust the USAF. Great performers will NEVER get rolled into the bottom 2 percent. BTW, what happens to those who are stratified 1 of 1 or work at a HQ or are in a stable filled with stallions or happen to work for a joint CC that doesn't write the Air Force way? Most of us have seen or know of people who got force shaped or RIF'd by numbers alone vice performance. Out of the 300 handed their walking papers, how many will feel like they got punched in the gut for being in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Quentin, Germany
 
5/6/2011 11:00:20 PM ET
S-Man, this is nothing new. The 2002 year group went through the exact same thing.
K-Man, DC
 
5/6/2011 7:16:29 PM ET
I was in the 2003 year group and jumped ship as soon as I saw the writing on the wall. However, I know I was the exception rather than the norm, as I wanted to get out early. That being said, I have many friends in that year group who are still in and want to stay in. I can't believe that the AF didn't realize in the early 2000s that they were commissioning too many people. It was way too easy to get commissioned in those years. I was prior service college sophomore with a 2.7 GPA general studies major and still got picked up for ROTC. My understanding is that two ROTC selection boards for two-year programs was nearly 99 percent. I just don't understand how the AF got themselves into this position.
Chris Kimball, Louisiana
 
5/6/2011 4:30:46 PM ET
Interesting...just summing up what we have already been told. What is even more interesting is the fact that '07 FSB Lt's were told they would never be Force Shaped again and we believed it. Now they just rename the FSB a RIF board and then say they are honoring that they didnt Force Shape again. Love it.
S-Man, San Antonio
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Officer development program applications due

USAFE fighter squadrons affected by sequestration  4

Faith in captivity: Vietnam War POW inspires Airmen  1

Total force readiness topic of Capitol Hill testimony  1

Dover Airman in 'fight of his life'

JSTARS: Connecting the dots on battlefield  4

Airman returns home to provide humanitarian support

First Lady announces certification plan for veteran jobs  4

AF uses innovative tactics to tackle sexual assault  4

New under secretary sworn in during Pentagon ceremony  5

Family servicemembers' group life insurance benefit changes  1

4 Airmen killed in MC-12 crash in Afghanistan  8

Through Airmen's Eyes: More than words: Airman shares passion for sign language  1

Eielson AFB youth show 'Purple Up' pride

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
The rewards of challenging ourselves

Challenging the status quo: Leadership in today's resource-constrained Air Force  6


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security & Policy     No Fear Act     E-publishing