Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > AF leaders brief BMT sexual misconduct investigation findings
 
Photos
Previous ImageNext Image
Results are in
Gen. Edward Rice Jr., commander of Air Education and Training Command, answers questions with Maj. Gen. Margaret Woodward, Air Force Chief of Safety and commander of Air Force Safety Center at Kirtland Air Force Base, N.M., during a Pentagon press briefing on Nov. 14, 2012. Rice presented the findings relating to Woodward's investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct at Basic Military Training. (U.S. Air Force photo/Scott M. Ash)
Download HiRes
 
Related Stories
 AETC seeks enduring solutions for sexual misconduct - 11/14/2012
 Air Force leaders issue statement on BMT investigation - 11/14/2012
 AETC seeks enduring solutions for sexual misconduct - 11/15/2012
 AF leaders target sexual assault in latest 'Letter to Airmen' - 11/16/2012
 AF leaders target sexual assault in latest 'Letter to Airmen' - 11/19/2012
 AF leaders target sexual assault in latest 'Letter to Airmen' - 11/19/2012
 AF leaders target sexual assault in latest 'Letter to Airmen' - 11/20/2012
 AF leaders target sexual assault in latest 'Letter to Airmen' - 11/26/2012
 
Related Links
 AETC Commander's Report to the Secretary of the Air Force
 Commander Directed Investigation Report - Developing America's Airmen
AF leaders brief BMT sexual misconduct investigation findings

Posted 11/15/2012   Updated 11/15/2012 Email story   Print story

    


by Master Sgt. Jess Harvey
Air Force Public Affairs Agency


11/15/2012 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Air Force leaders announced Nov. 14 to members of the press here the results of the commander-directed investigation regarding the occurrences of sexual misconduct within basic military training between October 2010 and June 2011.

The CDI was commissioned by Gen. Edward Rice, commander of Air Education and Training Command, June 20, 2012 based on substantiated reports of misconduct within Air Force BMT, and led by Maj. Gen. Margaret Woodward, Air Force Chief of Safety, Headquarters U.S. Air Force, Washington, D.C.

The final report included 22 findings and 46 recommendations that accurately reflect the deficiencies in the Air Force's basic military training program and provide effective proposals to remedy those deficiencies, according to Rice.

Of the 46 recommendations, Rice said AETC is working to implement 45 of them within a year's time to include the implementation of a training oversight council and ensuring there is a female instructor included on every team.

"The conditions that led to the abuse of power in basic military training are ever-present; thus, our vigilance and engagement must be persistent as well," said Rice. "To that end, I am directing the establishment of the Military Training Oversight Council, which will be chaired by a three star general."

"The purpose of this council is to ensure we have the appropriate level of leadership oversight over issues associated with trainee safety and the maintenance of good order and discipline," he said.

Another recommendation Rice highlighted was to have more female instructors in BMT because, as he pointed out, young Airmen come from all walks of life and some of them have never had been around a strong authority figure of the opposite sex but that's an integral part of the Air Force.

"They may be under the authority of a female or a male, and we want to make sure they have the full range of that experience in basic military training and this will make that happen," said Rice.

The change is to implement four-person training teams and every team will have at least one female Airman, but right now, there aren't enough female MTIs to make this happen, said Rice. The Air Force is working hard to build to that level.

"Of all the 45 recommendations, that will be the last one that we complete fully," said Rice. More female MTIs are already being recruited and trained, but like building any Airman, it takes time.

The recommendation not being implemented had to do with the length of basic training, said Rice. That's because AETC was already looking at cutting down the just over 8-week BMT schedule.

He said gaps in the schedule leave the trainees too much time to potentially get into mischief.
"I haven't rejected that recommendation," said Rice. "We are continuing to look at the proper length of basic training. It's just that we are looking at it in a different form."

According to Rice, all of the recommendations were in line with the commitment Air Force leadership has made to correct this situation. Of the 46 CDI recommendations, 20 are associated with strengthening institutional safeguards, 14 are associated with strengthening leadership, and 12 are associated with strengthening the MTI culture.

To perform the CDI and come up with the recommendations, Woodward conducted 215 in-depth interviews and surveyed more than 18,000 personnel and conducted focus groups with basic military trainees and training-instructor spouses. The investigation also included survey trips to many of the training locations throughout the military.

But, Rice pointed out, what went wrong is not a mystery to Air Force leadership.

"We understand the what, the how and the why of our deficiencies, and because we have this understanding, I am confident the solutions we are implementing will effectively address the root causes of the problems we have identified," said Rice.

"This report necessarily focuses on the few who violated (a) sacred trust and broke faith with fellow Airmen everywhere," Woodward said in her report. "It is important to remember that despite the extraordinary scrutiny of basic training. . .honorable men and women throughout the Air Force enlisted training complex continue to serve every day with distinction."



tabComments
11/28/2012 10:32:46 AM ET
I agree with KP. To 'piggyback' more...Realign the AF BMT training more towards training Airmen to serve in a professional military career looking to serve the nation rather than a 'corporate' job for the next four years. We're not the Marines but look at the pride and great sense of honor they instill within their Recruits and the distinct professionalism and code the Drill Instructors hold themselves to.We should start taking some lessons from the other services and start getting serious about our basic MILITARY TRAINING regimen. The USAF is not a society nor should it be viewed as one.Maybe then our instructors will take a more serious training approach. The PROPER training of our Airmen as defenders of this nation is NOT a JOKE or a sexual spree.
K, JBSA
 
11/25/2012 6:40:46 PM ET
gaps in the schedule leave the trainees too much time to potentially get into mischief. Thats part of why we need BMT to filter out these people before the BIG blue. If they get through basic then we get issues like we have in Japan now... IE drunken misconduct rape fights.. Dont cut out the gaps leave them and take this time to observe our new airman.
TSgt Ward, Kadena AB
 
11/24/2012 6:52:59 PM ET
Why don't men train male flights and women train female flightsThat's how it was in the good old days and it prevented this problem.
Aerohombre Mateo, Hollohombre Nuevo Mexico
 
11/23/2012 8:07:26 PM ET
It was not long ago BMT was extended from 6 to 8 weeks. The time parameters are not the problem. The issue is the lack of interest of quality NCO's to do the job. The Air Force cannot fill the short falls in manning currently but want to have additional instructors. I think it is a great idea but maybe the incentive for the special duty can be looked at. Choice assignment greater special duty pay and or allow longer special duty assignments. If an Airman is good at what he does and wants to continue the duty than dont put a cap on the assignment. An additional solution is to make the special duty AFSC's permanent. I could be a great crew chief and do that job for an entire career but if youre in a special duty assignment youre out after a period of time. Even changes within the First Sergeant career field are now going to be limited with the new AFI waiting to be signed. Yet again there are short falls there as well but First Sergeants are going to be forced out. CCA
Donald Branscum, Joint Base Anacostia-Bolling
 
11/21/2012 4:20:20 PM ET
The buddy concept should be practiced in connection with the Wingman concept.Starting the buddy concept in basic training will help the trainees develop the first core value Integrity First. Having a wingmanbuddy will beable to not only help keep each other in line but also help each other when they feel like giving up or giving in.
SSgt Adam Bass, HILL AFB UT
 
11/21/2012 3:50:50 PM ET
This happens in all branches. Don't kid yourself.
A, San Antonio
 
11/21/2012 3:04:27 PM ET
What the report doesn't address is the culture that led to having our BMT squadrons undermanned. How many rounds of budget drills and manpower cuts led to a situation where a 16 hour duty day - everyday - was acceptable practice.Unfortunately it took a tragic structural failure to bring common sense solutions to systemic problems.Will this be a high-water manning mark that just keeps getting chipped away as we move forward
reid, montgomery
 
11/21/2012 2:15:06 PM ET
How does making training shorter solve anything If there's white space in what is already the shortest boot camp in the DOD why not DO MORE Amp up the pressure on both personnel and recruits. They shouldn't even have enough energy or spare mental capacity to get aroused or plot trouble. It all gets back to the fact that we have de-militarized the AF from day one of basic. If you want a professional military force you need a professional military environment... there was a girl on here months ago defending the TIs saying they called him Dad that tells me all I need to know about the professionalism in BMT these days.
KP, VA
 
11/21/2012 11:44:42 AM ET
In response to Eric - When I went through Army basic training you always had a buddy. Getting yelled at by a drill sergeant required a buddy to be standing right next to you. If you were caught without one you had to scream out I need a buddy Air Force basic had none of that.
SSgt Fears, Scott AFB
 
11/21/2012 10:37:37 AM ET
Have other branches of services had issues like this If not what are they doing right that the AF isn't
Eric, Hill
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Jennies to jets to stealth: Bomb wing turns 90

Concentration camp survivor to fighter pilot: 'Freedom a beautiful thing'  4

Wounded warriors adapt, overcome at Andrews sports camp

Pilots, combat systems officers may be eligible for retention incentives   2

Alert Reaper Airmen find IED  1

Luke AFB F-16 crashes, pilots safely eject  4

AF drops 50,000 plus gallons of retardant on Colorado fires

352nd SOG welcomes Osprey to fleet

SecDef: DOD welcomes Supreme Court decision  37

Weather warns warriors, saves services silver  1

Squadron's lone female gunner aims high  4

Flight engineer reaches combat sortie milestone  4

Training helps deployed Airman save lives  2

Acting SecAF recounts journey to equality  23

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Our commitment, our community

'Lucky' people take personal responsibility for their own success  15


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention      Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention     FOIA     IG   EEO