Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > SecDef says furlough days reduced for civilians
SecDef says furlough days reduced for civilians

Posted 3/29/2013 Email story   Print story

    


by Nick Simeone
American Forces Press Service


3/29/2013 - WASHINGTON (AFPS) -- The Defense Department has revised from 22 to 14 the number of days hundreds of thousands of civilian employees could be furloughed this year because of the budget sequester, Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel announced today.

In addition, a senior Defense Department official speaking on background told reporters the start of the furloughs will be delayed until mid-to-late June, after more than 700,000 department employees receive furlough notices now set to go out in early May. Furloughs would happen over seven two-week pay periods until the end of September, when the current fiscal year ends, the senior official said, with employees likely to be told not to come to work for two days during each of those pay periods.

Department officials say they are still working to determine which employees might be exempted.

Hagel characterized the reduced furloughs as well as a revised estimate of sequestration's impact on the defense budget as good news. The changes follow Congressional approval last week of a defense appropriations bill that prevented an additional six billion dollars in cuts, ordered under sequestration, from taking effect.

"It reduces a shortfall at least in the operations budget," the secretary told reporters at a Pentagon news conference. "We came out better than we went in under the sequester, where it looks like our number is $41 billion [in cuts] now versus the $46 billion."

But despite a Congressional reprieve, Hagel said the Pentagon is still going to be short at least $22 billion for operations and maintenance, "and that means we are going to have to prioritize and make some cuts and do what we've got to do," including making sharp reductions in base operating support and training for nondeployed units.

More critical in the long run, he said, is how budget cuts will affect readiness and the department's overall mission. Because of that concern, he said he has directed Deputy Defense Secretary Ash Carter and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, to conduct an intensive department-wide review of U.S. strategic interests including how to protect the nation with fewer resources. "How do we prioritize the threats and then the capabilities required to deal with threats?" he said. "There will be some significant changes, there's no way around it."

Dempsey said the department has already exhausted 80 percent of its operating funds halfway through the fiscal year and characterized the current budget situation as "not the deepest, but the steepest decline in our budget ever," and warned it will affect military readiness into the future.

"We will have to trade at some level and to some degree our future readiness for current operations," the chairman said. He called on elected leaders to give the Pentagon the budget flexibility it needs to carry out institutional reforms.

"We can't afford excess equipment," Dempsey said. "We can't afford excess facilities. We have to reform how we buy weapons and services. We have to reduce redundancy. And we've got to change, at some level, our compensation structure."



tabComments
4/4/2013 4:31:28 PM ET
Whay not reduce and eliminate some of the boondogle programs that are so expensive that they absorb substantial parts of our budget yet are not proven to be mission effective. It really is not a good idea to endanger the the morale of your top scientists and researchers... if we lose them or they go looking for greener pastures. they will NOT return. Their replacements with experience will come from where
CIV at Wright PATT, Wright Patterson AFB
 
4/4/2013 4:01:32 PM ET
How about instead of cutting the actual workers that we need cut or temporarily stop the entertainment groups such as Tops in Blue and the myriad of bands and other performance organizations that not only get a paycheck but must be transported housed and fed when they're traveling.
Got an idea, Scott AFB
 
4/4/2013 10:08:49 AM ET
@Realistic Are you kidding me You tell that to any 21 year old or AB or civilian just starting out. I guess your world is perfect but not very realistic as your name implies. Think man
Bill, Texas
 
4/4/2013 8:55:54 AM ET
Has everyone forgotten that you are supposed to have at least six months worth of your bills stored away for situations like this I understand that it will significantly impact everyone and their lifestyle when this furlough happens. However think about everyone who works a regular job like at WalMart or the mall or at a restaurant and think about how much LESS money they make than you. And then realize that when they take a vacation or a sick day they do not get paid for the days they were not at work.
Realistic, MacDill
 
4/3/2013 12:52:51 PM ET
I don't think leadership was prepared for these sort of cuts and know they value our services as civil servants. We do take the same oath to serve our country. Before implementing furloughs our service leaders need to determine other avenues to cut vs the support. 1. Freeze PCSs for one year.2. Less TDYs and more online training.3. Our services have proven they can all work together. More consolidation of services. 4. Put medical benefits back as it was prior to 1994. Either you receive care at military treatment facilities or have Champus off base. Just imagine all the savings to DoD.
Kaye, Tampa Florida
 
4/3/2013 2:41:44 AM ET
I have an idea...eliminate the contract for cleaning crews and groundskeepers. Would you rather take out your own trash or be furloughed Case in point...when I was at the Pentagon we had 2 cleaners plus an escort visit us weekly. The cleaners earned 15 dollars an hour and the escort make 60K a year to follow the cleaners around since he had a security clearance. Elimiate the 3 positions and thats 100K a year. Exponentially thats hundreds of millions a year across the Air Force.
G, Incirlik
 
4/2/2013 2:09:50 PM ET
14 Days One day is too many Our leadership has convinced the world that they need each and every one of us. Any number of days sends a message to Congress and the American Public that maybe Civil Service is as fat as the media says it is. Allegedly all of us are working jobs that are essential to the continuation of operations.
Worker@Holloman, Holloman AFB
 
4/2/2013 9:24:10 AM ET
Totally agree with Worker at Tinker that only makes sense. 14 unscheduled unpaid days off. Hm. I think I take one day a pay period. I pretty sure there still 14 pay periods left before October. if not then I pull my Military on top of the Furlough day if i have to. Eitehr or we should start today not in June.
Worker, YARS Ohio
 
4/2/2013 9:23:43 AM ET
I'm glad they cut it back to 14 but I agree with Worker at Tinker it would be much easier to handle with one day per pay period or allow each worker the flexability to schedule how they want to take the days. I might be interested in a 2 week period without pay if I can schedule it in advance I could get a part time job to cover the gap or take an at-home vacation and get a bunch of projects done. Please don't try to cop out and say it would be a scheduling nightmare we already let our RA's run our finances so once they agreed to our plan it could be put in place with minimal impact. Also to address the comment by Worker at Peterson Why do you only care about the higher ranking GS personnel It's much more likely they will be impacted to a lesser degree than those below them as GS pay at the bottom rungs of the pay scale makes it likely they are living close to paycheck to paycheck. To conclude this everyone needs to pay close attention to the performance of their local
Worker@Warren, F.E. Warren AFB
 
4/2/2013 8:55:36 AM ET
As a civilian employee and a reservist I would prefer to do my 2 week furlough at once and pull my reserve duty during that time. This would be a win win. I do not like that the amount of days are decided for me.
blue suiter and civilian, Randolph
 
4/2/2013 8:33:07 AM ET
Fort Meade well said amazing no one sees it on the other side until they are there or close to it. No matter in uniform or a Civ servant we are all in the same boat. We each must plan accordingly for our own needs and continue to support what we all do......which is support our DoD no matter how small or how big. Look for solutions not complaints please....
Retired Blue Suiter now Civ, WPAFB
 
4/1/2013 2:28:54 PM ET
Scott AFB your comments are way out of line. Tinker AFB is right these sequestration solutions are due to poor planning and management at the highest levels and now we all of us are paying for it. Tinker AFB has a valid gripe and it is easy for those of us on the outside looking in to make suggestions. But did you hear all the griping that blue suiters did two weeks ago when it looked like we were losing tuition assistance The outcry from that was much greater than our civilian brethren have made regarding taking a pay-cut. Please start having some perspective. This situation sucks for us blue suiters but not any less so for our civilian brothers and sisters. And there is no guarantee that Tinker AFB makes more than Scott AFB I've looked at my finances and I need to get mid-GS12 when I retire in 3 years in order to make the same amount of money that I make now. If I promote in the meantime I may need GS-13. We have a lot of sub-GS12s that will be affected by this
Blue Suiter at Fort Meade, Fort Meade
 
4/1/2013 11:22:39 AM ET
@WorkerAnother Worker - Nobody is saying you can't start preparing for it now. If you can deal witih one day a pay period for more months than start taking that one day and save it for whenif they implement the two days and you'll have the same result. Your financial preparations dont have to be driven by the government's scheduling.
Jay, Barksdale AFB
 
4/1/2013 10:56:45 AM ET
I disagree with worker @ Tinker I would rather live like I was furloughed now put the money into emergency saving and then use that money if the furlough actually happens. If the furlough does not happen then it's money in the bank.
Worker @ Hanscom, Hanscom AFB
 
4/1/2013 10:17:56 AM ET
I agree with Worker at Tinker I would rather it start early than later. One day a pay period and two days a month is way easier to swallow than two days a pay period and losing 4 days a month of pay. Seriously think about the employees that are higher ranking GS pay scales.
Worker at Peterson Peterson AFB, Peterson AFB
 
4/1/2013 9:52:47 AM ET
I agree with Worker. Start now and give us the flexibility to choose when to take the pay hits.
Another Worker, Seymour Johnson
 
4/1/2013 9:36:46 AM ET
@ Worker at Tinker Seems to me like they're trying to make sure they only cut what they have to. After all they did just say you're getting an additional 8 days of work. You could be grateful for those extra 8 days instead of being upset with the way they're scheduling it. If you're in such a hurry to have your work hours cut I'll tak your 8 days of pay. I guarantee you get paid more than I do...
Blue Suiter, Scott AFB
 
3/29/2013 4:19:01 PM ET
Well it is great to hear they are cutting back on the number of days but they should start the furloughs now to allow for spreading the days out to more payperiods. I can deal with one day a pay period for more months a lot better then 2 days a pay period for a shorter length of time. Seems to me the guys making all the desisions are Blue Suiters or Senior Civilians who make enough that a day or two of lost pay eacy paycheck means nothing to them.
Worker at Tinker, Tinker AFB
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
CSAF to sponsor 3 captains for PhD program

Davis-Monthan Airmen work to end veteran homelessness by 2015

Jennies to jets to stealth: Bomb wing turns 90

Concentration camp survivor to fighter pilot: 'Freedom a beautiful thing'  5

Wounded warriors adapt, overcome at Andrews sports camp

Pilots, combat systems officers may be eligible for retention incentives   2

Alert Reaper Airmen find IED  1

Luke AFB F-16 crashes, pilots safely eject  4

AF drops 50,000 plus gallons of retardant on Colorado fires

352nd SOG welcomes Osprey to fleet

SecDef: DOD welcomes Supreme Court decision  37

Weather warns warriors, saves services silver  1

Squadron's lone female gunner aims high  4

Flight engineer reaches combat sortie milestone  4

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Our commitment, our community

'Lucky' people take personal responsibility for their own success  16


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention      Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention     FOIA     IG   EEO