Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Stratcom Chief: Minot AFB case shows integrity of nuclear enterprise
Stratcom Chief: Minot AFB case shows integrity of nuclear enterprise

Posted 5/9/2013   Updated 5/9/2013 Email story   Print story

    


by Donna Miles
American Forces Press Service


5/9/2013 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- The Air Force's aggressive response when missile-launch crews at Minot Air Force Base, N.D., fell short of established standards during an inspection in March underscores the integrity of the  nuclear weapons program, the commander of U.S. Strategic Command told Congress May 9.

"I do think they reacted very aggressively to the mistakes they saw," Gen. C. Robert Kehler told the House Armed Services Committee, adding  that Air Force officials are working to deal not only with mistakes revealed during the inspection, but also the root causes.

"They don't accept those mistakes" Kehler said. "At some level, I think what we are seeing here is a product of the increased scrutiny and the  increased diligence that is going into these inspections, and the responses to them."

Kehler said he is delving into problems revealed at Minot AFB, but assured the panel that he remains confident in the nuclear weapons enterprise and the ability of the unit to conduct its mission.

The inspection involved crew members who man the underground launch control centers, typically junior officers, he reported. Based on the results, Air Force officials removed 17 officers from their duties associated with Minuteman missile operations.

As the overseer of the Defense Department's entire nuclear enterprise, Kehler told Congress he personally reviews all inspection results and has tasked his inspector general to look into the March inspection report and responses to it in collaboration with the commander of Air Force Global Strike Command.

"I will continue to watch this very carefully," he said. "I know the Air Force is digging into this very deliberately. But at this point, I remain confident in that unit's ability to perform its mission."

The general emphasized the stringent standards for these inspections.

"The nuclear-capable units have the highest standards," Kehler said, noting that he personally has undergone the demanding inspection procedures that generally consist of written tests and operations within simulators.

"They are extremely difficult (inspection procedures) and filled with scenarios that you typically would not see in the real world," he told the House panel.

Kehler said he actually would be concerned if every unit received a 100-percent passing grade during the inspections.

"It would suggest to me that they weren't being tough enough in inspections," he said.

As the review continues, Kehler told the panel, he remains confident in Minot AFB's nuclear operations.

"To date, I don't see any reason to have less than full confidence in this unit," he said. "I don't see anything that would cause me to lose confidence in the ability (of the) unit to perform the missions safely and effectively."



tabComments
5/15/2013 11:10:32 AM ET
Nyna thanks for your comment and your service. The fact that Minot's wings are still getting beaten up during inspections demonstrates that the current nuclear enterprise has serious issues with training and experience. I'm sure you get it that the nuclear business goes on regardless of who's there and it must be done correctly at all times. All nuclear units have personnel turnover so that's not a valid excuse or justification for poor performance. The new meat must be trained and instilled with the importance of the mission just as the older people have been. If 17 recent failures in the MW are 'better now than they were' then better is still not good enough.
Excellent NSI x 3, Outside the WSA
 
5/15/2013 12:07:17 AM ET
Some of you are saying that leadership needs to be fired and what not. I just left from there during my tour there the 91 MW commander has been fired twice and the BW commandber has been fired several group commanders have also been fired. Trust that they do take this seriously and that they do take action for all incidents involved over the years there. Those wings are way better now than they were when I got there. The Airman has stepped it up and have passed serveral inspections since those incidents that have been brought up in the comments. They are getting better but with turn over there are always new personnel that need to be trained.
Nyna, Japan
 
5/13/2013 10:16:41 AM ET
If leadership had to wait until an inspection to discover problems in the missile force then they were not being observant. These problems would have shown up in monthly test scores problems in monthly training rides failures in annual checks and inspections on site by commanders. This is a failure starting at the top. I served my time in the launch control center and 100 percent correct all the time was the only acceptable outcome. Yes it made for a nerve racking existence but that beat the alternative.
JD, Northern Tier
 
5/12/2013 8:34:20 AM ET
There is only one person who needs to be brought up on charges for this situation. The person who forwarded that e-mail to the Associated Press needs to face a court martial. Expedient and decisive action on the part of military leaders is what prevents serious problems. I give kudos to the leaders at this unit who have the courage to take action instead of taking the approach that SATISFACTORY is good enough. I have been in many units that would have taken an inspection with only one MARGINAL rating as a successful one. Most in this nation will not realize the blanket of protection that these warriors provide until -- God forbid -- it is gone. And then it will be too late.
Realistic, Remote
 
5/12/2013 8:27:10 AM ET
This happened because we have stopped being a military organization and have become a corporation. As others have said SAC warriors would not have let this happen. There should be seventeen civilians leaving Minot today....but there won't be. Time to stop being touchy feely and get back to the business of defense. Peace is OUR PROFESSION.
A SNCO, An AFB Near You
 
5/10/2013 2:29:56 PM ET
General Lemay is turning over in his grave-again. In SAC that Commander would have been fired on the spot. Our strategic forces are a pale image of SAC but they are politically correct and properly deversified.
Kirk USAF Ret., South Florida
 
5/10/2013 1:01:19 PM ET
I sincerely hope the individual responsible for leaking that info to the Associated Press is dealt with harshly.
CKJ, CONUS
 
5/10/2013 12:13:39 PM ET
If the minimum is not good enough then it should not be called the minimum.
Sgt Peanut, cyberspace
 
5/10/2013 9:08:43 AM ET
Gen Kehler says 'They don't accept those mistakes.' The wing leadership had already accepted them long before the inspectors arrived got off the plane There's no 'increased scrutiny' or 'increased diligence'. If anything scrutiny and diligence have dropped off dramatically since 1992. No unit goes into an NSI so poorly prepared trained or disciplined but somehow this one did. This inspection was not a surprise. Granted the wing received a passing grade if only on the backs of those who did perform properly but those responsible for these 17 officers should be sending out resumes now. And as a career nuke guy Gen Kehler should get his head out of the sand and stop proclaiming just how great things are.
Excellent NSI x 3, Outside the WSA
 
5/10/2013 8:41:01 AM ET
I am also a former missileer. This has been coming for some time. It started with the demise of SAC. The force became a gentler kinder force. There were no second chances and only 100 percent accuracy at all times was accepted. Now you can mess up muliple times and all you get is retrained. Give me a break. Minot is also where they loaded live bombs on a B52 instead of dummy bombs. Firings need to happen starting at the top.
Jerry , USA
 
5/9/2013 7:54:13 PM ET
As a former Minuteman crew member and also an Evaluator I will say these failings have happened before and were corrected. Today it gets lots of press mostly because once something is put in an email it will be resent. When I was a crew member 1962-1966 the enemy was the Soviets and the threat was real. Today the threats are notionally China and Russia only because they are a demonstrated nuclear power. The more real threats are North Korea and Iran. It's not that easy to stay motivated. That said Global Strike Command still has to reverse years of ennui when the missile wings were under Space Command.
Allan J. MacLaren, San Jose CA
 
5/9/2013 5:21:40 PM ET
When you have one or two officers decertified due to attitude it's the fault of the officers. When you have SEVENTEEN decertified for attitude it's the fault of unit management - can't call them leadership. Where were the supervisors Where were the field-grade officers All out doing today's AF mission of PT and bake sales Real leadership would have nipped this in the bud. Now the AF will lose 17 young officers because their careers are ruined. They'll separate at the first opportunity.
Otis R. Needleman, Reality
 
5/9/2013 5:08:20 PM ET
I don't think this would have happened during the old days of SAC. What happened to the AF Human Reliability Program and strict crew CertificationNot happy what I read of the personnel problems in the USAF today.Former Missile Combat Crew Member and retired Chief.
Joseph P Molinaro, Syracuse NY
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Pilots, combat systems officers may be eligible for retention incentives   1

Alert Reaper Airmen find IED

Luke AFB F-16 crashes, pilots safely eject  1

AF drops 50,000 plus gallons of retardant on Colorado fires

352nd SOG welcomes Osprey to fleet

SecDef: DOD welcomes Supreme Court decision  29

Weather warns warriors, saves services silver

Squadron's lone female gunner aims high  1

Flight engineer reaches combat sortie milestone  3

Training helps deployed Airman save lives  1

Acting SecAF recounts journey to equality  6

Civil engineers recall, reflect 17 years after Khobar Towers bombing  1

Air Force selects 5,654 for technical sergeant  2

Aerial firefighting continues against Rocky Mountain fires

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Our commitment, our community

'Lucky' people take personal responsibility for their own success  11


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention      Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention     FOIA     IG   EEO