Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > AF officials announce Combat Air Forces restructure plan
Story at a Glance
 Some 250 legacy aircraft will be retired under the restructuring plan
 Savings will be used to build a smaller, more flexible and lethal bridge to fifth-generation fighters
 Savings also will be used to reduce current capability gaps.
 
Photos 
Eagles soar again
Air Force officials have announced plans to retire nearly 250 legacy fighters including the F-15 Eagle, shown here. Some 112 Eagles will be retired under the Combat Air Forces restructuring plan. (U.S. Air Force photo/Tech. Sgt. Shane A. Cuomo)
Download HiRes
 
Related Stories
 Elmendorf to retire F-15s next year - 5/20/2009
 Elmendorf to retire F-15s next year - 5/20/2009
 
Related Biographies
  MICHAEL B. DONLEY
 GENERAL NORTON A. SCHWARTZ
AF officials announce Combat Air Forces restructure plan

Posted 5/20/2009 Email story   Print story

    

5/20/2009 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- Following the May 7 roll-out of the fiscal year 2010 budget proposal for the Department of Defense, Air Force officials announced plans to retire legacy fighters to fund a smaller and more capable force and redistribute people for higher priority missions.
 
The Combat Air Forces restructuring plan would accelerate the retirement of approximately 250 aircraft, which includes 112 F-15 Eagles, 134 F-16 fighting Falcons and three A-10 Thunderbolt IIs. This does not include the five fighters previously scheduled for retirement in FY10. 

"We have a strategic window of opportunity to do some important things with fighter aircraft restructuring," said Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley. "By accepting some short-term risk, we can convert our inventory of legacy fighters and F-22 (Raptors) into a smaller, more flexible and lethal bridge to fifth-generation fighters like the F-35 (Lightning II Joint Strike Fighter). We'll also add manpower to capabilities needed now for operations across the spectrum of conflict." 

Under the plan, cost savings of $355 million in FY10 and $3.5 billion over the next five fiscal years would be used to reduce current capability gaps. Air Force officials would invest most of the funds in advanced capability modifications to remaining fighters and bombers. Some would go toward procuring munitions for joint warfighters, including the small diameter bomb, hard-target weapons and the AIM-120D and AIM-9X missiles. The remainder would be dedicated to the procurement or sustainment of critical intelligence capabilities such as the advanced targeting pod as well as enabling technologies for tactical air controllers and special operations forces. 

"We've taken this major step only after a careful assessment of the current threat environment and our current capabilities," said Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Norton Schwartz. "Make no mistake, we can't stand still on modernizing our fighter force. The Air Force's advantage over potential adversaries is eroding, and this endangers both air and ground forces alike unless there is a very significant investment in bridge capabilities and fifth-generation aircraft. CAF restructuring gets us there." 

The CAF restructuring plan, which will require appropriate environmental analyses, would enable Air Force officials to use reassignment and retraining programs to move approximately 4,000 manpower authorizations to emerging and priority missions such as manned and unmanned surveillance operations and nuclear deterrence operations. 

This realignment would include the expansion of MQ-1 Predator, MQ-9 Reaper and MC-12 Liberty aircrews; the addition of a fourth active-duty B-52 Stratofortress squadron; and the expansion of Distributed Common Ground System and information processing, exploitation and dissemination capabilities for continued combatant commander support in Afghanistan and Iraq, among other adjustments. 

Secretary Donley and General Schwartz have committed the Air Force to initiatives that will reinvigorate its nuclear enterprise and field 50 unmanned combat air patrols for ongoing operations by FY11. 

"What we're looking for is a force mix that meets the current mission requirements of combatant commanders while providing a capable force to meet tomorrow's challenges," Secretary Donley said.



tabComments
5/27/2009 5:07:46 AM ET
It's sad that you still will not publish any comments that are the least bit crtical of AF senior leadership. They gave us the train wreck that is the aging combat Air Force as they sacrificed known capability, retired weapons systems early and failed to fund needed upgrades within the F-15 and F-16 community all in the name of the F-22 Raptor and its promise of the silver bullet. Publishing comments that do not toe the party line might actual create thought and discussion in regards to what direction the force is heading.
William Milligan, Wilmington NC
 
5/26/2009 8:02:04 PM ET
A bit precipitous if you ask me. Correct me if I'm wrong but we are still at war right Wouldn't a long term subtle approach be a bit more appropriate. 15 years instead of what seems to be 6 maybe In my humble opinion it would make more sense to keep the enemy guessing as to how and when certain programsaircraft will be decommissioned. I would assume that a longer term transition would force any capable enemy into second guessing attack during potential windows of opportunity. It would seem much easier to take a chance at an opportunity during a smaller time frame. A short term transition could potentially have the same effect but that seems extremely unlikely. It would be safer to assume that the US has many foreign enemies that will strike at any opportunity given. We have be prepared to encounter and engage these threats.I guess I don't know enough about it but it seems pretty hasty to me.
John S. Faherty, Plymouth MA
 
5/21/2009 10:35:01 PM ET
I hope that they do not leave a gap between the Air Force and the Army Ground troops when they retire the A-10. The A-10 or something similar would be easier and cheaper to produce and maintain than the F-22 or F-35 especialy when you realize that what ever they do assign needs to be able to take hits and loiter over the battlefield in order to support the ground troops.
Ralph L. Branham, Norman Oklahoma
 
5/21/2009 12:36:14 PM ET
I would think the conservative approach would be to increase numbers of combat aircraft and pilots so that any situation can be handled. What happens when China gets tired of their economy being so closely tied to ours and decides the military option is a better one. What good is our technology when their aircraft outnumber ours so drastically?
Casey Hall, Las Vegas NV
 
5/21/2009 10:22:01 AM ET
I hope our nation's enemies fail to recognize their own strategic windows of opportunity to take advantage of our soon-to-be miniscule combat air forces structure.
Edward H. Thompson, Longwood FL
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
AF stops moves to Colorado

Air Force Week in Photos

Through Airmen's Eyes: Student pilot survives lymphoma, continues dream

Skies to conquer: Langley Airman scales Mount Everest

Anatomy of a hurricane hunter: When storms get personal  1

Academy firefighters step up efforts to combat Black Forest blaze   2

Air Force removes six career fields from constrained list

Air Force C-130s drop 25,000 gallons of retardant on Colorado fire   1

Official outlines challenges in securing DOD communications  5

As Nellis AFB grounds aircraft, training goes virtual   3  |  VIDEO

Air Force leaders congratulate Army on 238 years  4

African airmen return to Air University for U.S. Air Forces Africa symposium  1

Tinker AFB, community develop cost-saving initiatives  1

Making the trip: Airmen tackle life at missile facilities  6

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Filling squares  13

Keeping service in perspective  8


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention      Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention     FOIA     IG   EEO