AF.mil  
Join the Air Force

News > Air Force officials to use commercial jet fuel to replace military spec fuel
 
Related Links
 Officials test commercial fuel to replace JP-8 fuel
Air Force officials to use commercial jet fuel to replace military spec fuel

Posted 11/9/2009 Email story   Print story



by Master Sgt. Russell Petcoff
Secretary of the Air Force Public Affairs


11/9/2009 - WASHINGTON (AFNS) -- To reduce reliance on military specification products, simplify the fuel supply chain and save money, Air Force Petroleum Agency researchers will conduct demonstrations to use commercially available jet fuel instead of military standard JP-8 fuel. 

The demonstrations of Jet A fuel versus JP-8 fuel will occur at Dover Air Force Base, Del.; Little Rock AFB, Ark.; McChord AFB, Wash.; and Minneapolis-St. Paul Air Reserve Station, Minn. Each base has C-5 Galaxy, C-17 Globemaster III or C-130 Hercules primary-assigned aircraft.
 
According to Master Sgt. Danny Walker, AFPA Jet A initiative program manager, each base will begin issuing Jet A in the next several weeks. 

"The actual first Jet A issue dates at each base depend on how quickly existing JP-8 stocks are used," Sergeant Walker said. 

During the demonstration, suppliers can put Jet A fuel into shared pipelines without having to worry about comingling like they had to with JP-8, according to Sergeant Walker. By eliminating the need for a specialty fuel like JP-8 and using a more readily available Jet A, refineries and fuel depots will be able to reduce infrastructure costs and save money which they will be able to pass along to the DOD, Sergeant Walker added. 

According to Jim Richardson, from the AFPA, officials estimate the annual savings at $40 million. Savings may increase as the conversion potentially expands across DOD within the CONUS, he added. 

Mr. Richardson also noted that another part of the initiative is sponsoring research that may lead to a reduction or elimination of certain military additives. By reducing the need for military additives, Air Force suppliers can reduce the logistics footprint during contingency operations, he added. 

One of the key parts of the demonstration is the ability to inject military-specific fuel additives into Jet A prior to use, according to Mike Nelson, from the AFPA. By injecting fuel system icing inhibitor further forward in the supply chain, the quantities can be reduced by nearly 60 percent, he said. 

FSII is the most expensive of the military fuel additives, according to Mr. Nelson. By reducing the quantity injected, DOD saves money. AFPA researchers are partnering with those in the fuel industry to test several additive injection systems at various points in the supply chain, according to Mr. Nelson. 

The demonstrations are set to run for 12 months. Following the demonstration, an independent agency will take all the data gathered and perform a business case analysis, according to Sergeant Walker. Afterwards, AFPA and Defense Energy Support Center officials will review the data to determine a future course of action, the sergeant said. 

More information regarding this AFSO21 initiative was captured in an earlier story at: http://www.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123148345



tabComments
11/13/2009 2:23:36 PM ET
Jet-A will leak in some military jets. It leaked from the T-37 more than anyone would admit. If DOD doesn't have its own fuel spec and supply, then our wartime requirements may be inadquately calculated. Only a bean-counter would think this will save money. Mr. Lillie is right. It is a stupid idea.
Jack, San Antonio
 
11/12/2009 7:35:54 PM ET
When deployed for Desert Shield -- KC-135s -- Jet A fuel was all that was available in-country. I don't remember how many thousands of pounds we off-loaded during the time we were there. We couldn't tell any differance between the two fuels and there didn't appear there were any addional maintenance issues either. The only people who objected to the Jet A fuel were Navy fliers, if they asked what we had on board before an off-load.
MSgt Robert Berg, Barksdale La
 
11/12/2009 5:18:43 PM ET
SAFETY SAFETY SAFETY Nothing more needs to be said. Absolutely stupid idea.
MICHAEL LILLIE, Ca.
 
11/10/2009 1:46:59 AM ET
I wonder if the people who plan to use Jet A fuel for military aircraft are bean-counters not engineers. We have always had the ability to use Jet A fuel on miltary aircraft. It is considered an Alternate Fuel. The fact that it reduces aircaft performance needs to be taken into consideration. It also will affect cold weather operations. How much will really be saved by this policy? Could it wind up costing even more than sticking with JP-8? I'm proud to see that the 934th Airlift Wing is selected for testing this theory on C-130's. Hope they can find out which fuel is best. Don't go fixing things that aren't broke, but do get some useful information from the tests. Good Luck!
MSgt Edward Vigilante USAF Ret., Burnsville Minnesota
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Air National Guard graduates first class from Maxwell's Officer Training School

Air Force undersecretary nominee testifies

Grand Forks Airmen donate 12,000-plus volunteer hours, earn presidential award  
1


Corrections experts, engineers visit Afghan prison construction site

VA secretary announces study of Vietnam-era women veterans

Air Force experts, Iraqi aviation authority restructure airways  
1


DOD, VA officials announce disability evaluation system pilot expansion

Medics teach mental health classes in Philippines

Secretary of State visits servicemembers in Afghanistan

Weapons school completes large scale mobility exercise

DOD, Air Force rated positive in Gallup study  
1


Guard leaders meet to 'add value to America'

Air Force Academy firefighters smash own world record  |  VIDEO

Photo essay: Checking out the B-1B for combat

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Mentoring easy as pie

I just ask myself, 'What's in it for me?'


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing