Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Commentary - If you write it, own it
If you write it, own it

Posted 4/25/2012 Email story   Print story

    


Commentary by Maj. T. Allen Herritage
2nd Combat Camera Squadron


4/25/2012 - HILL AIR FORCE BASE, Utah -- Two recent stories on the Air Force's web page drew significant reaction in the site's comments section. Both a story on finance troops being awarded the Bronze Star Medal and the news that Air Force Space Command was ending wear of flight suits by non-aircrew personnel drove more comments than any story I've ever read on the site.

One attracted so many negative comments; the comments themselves became the subject of a story in Air Force Times. The reason for the publicity wasn't the sheer number of comments, but their nature. Many, if not most, of the comments on both stories were sarcastic, bitter, or just plain rude.

It's not the existence of negative comments that bothers me. I think discourse on Air Force issues is good for us as Airmen and our service as a whole. And if you take some time to consider the arguments surrounding the issues covered in these stories, there are some valid points on both sides.

This discourse can become heated. That's OK in my book. I appreciate someone who is passionate about their opinion and ready to defend it. The problem here is that there is a direct correlation to the nature of the comment and whether or not the commentator was anonymous. Almost without exception, comments that were rude or sarcastic came from an anonymous source.

I recognize the subjectivity of the last sentence. What's rude to one person may be perfectly acceptable to another. But it's safe to say that the wording of most of these comments would be changed drastically, or even left unsaid, if their originator's identity was attached to them.

The anonymity offered by the internet has given those with an axe to grind a false sense of empowerment. I say 'false' because the very nature of their comments limits their utility. The angry rant in the comments section rarely inspires real change and usually only serves one person--the one doing the ranting.

I'm not advocating a "If you don't have anything nice to say, don't say anything at all" approach.
Our business is serious. Sometimes we have to say things that are unpleasant to others. But, as leaders, I think we have the duty to own it. This isn't just about comments on a web page. It's about accountability. If you want to criticize something, have the intestinal fortitude to defend that criticism and the manner in which it was conveyed. If you can't own it, why say it at all?



tabComments
4/27/2012 9:18:14 AM ET
While I agree that rude or disrespectful comments are not constructive I don't agree with the Major. My comments are my own and should not represent my position rank or base.This is not a performance report so proper identification is not necessary. If someone makes a rude or disrespectful comment I think the majority of us are intelligent enough to dismiss the comment. Let's focus on what was said more than who said it.
Kal El, Krypton
 
4/27/2012 6:09:00 AM ET
I put my name on it every time no fear over here. Right or wrong good or bad. Betta ask somebody if you don't know. No need to sugarcoat but convey your points like you have some home training and act like an adult. Plain and simple.
MSgt Henry Thomas, Southwest Asia
 
4/26/2012 3:08:46 PM ET
As a regular follower of AF forums, I have noticed that a majority of the disrespectful comments are from members who seek nothing more than to stir the pot. Trolling will continue from people who enjoy causing a heated debate and pull people into an arguement that has no merit. I will continue to remain anonymous not because I refuse to own my words but because it is my right to voice my opinion with fear of reprisal.
Anonymous, Here
 
4/26/2012 2:20:35 PM ET
I think those who comment negatively are using this as a venue to point out something that is important to them and just hoping that leadership might read it and wake up. Issues like Bronze Stars, Multiple Uniform problems, etc. come to mind. I agree if the statement is straight up rude then it should be omitted, but having a differing opinion is ok and not wanting your leadership to consider you a whiner is my reason for hiding.
Me, Probably Every Base
 
4/26/2012 12:51:44 PM ET
I agree with what you say for the most part. Many of those comments were harsh and would have never been said in person or with a full name. However, comments are so subjective to the reader. All it takes is one person to get butt hurt and fly off the handle. They get their feelings hurt so much they decide to completely jump their chain of command and take it to a higher level of leadership. Then before you know it emails are shot gunned out and everybody and their brother are aware of it. I know this cause it happened to me. It was beyond riduculous and the comment wasn't even considered harmful by my cc. Never again.
Anonymous2, CA
 
4/26/2012 11:25:23 AM ET
Sergeant Gary Stein owned it and he was promptly shown the curb. No thanks
John Doe Jr., Springfield
 
4/26/2012 11:04:58 AM ET
Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask and he will tell you the truth....Oscar Wilde
OW, usa
 
4/26/2012 10:47:48 AM ET
Completely agree with Anonymous Major. Unfortunately the moment you share your candid feedback is the moment it will be held against you. Folks can say what they want on that subject, but I've seen the be completely honest with me phrase backfire to many times. As long as your views fall inline, you'll be fine. But sorry never been accused of being a yes man Call it like I see it and sometimes people don't want to hear that
Anonymous MSgt, At a base
 
4/26/2012 10:09:25 AM ET
I agree the comments were unwarranted. Much of the frustration is we've seen airmen involved in front line hostilities and ambushes, living with sister service or other NATO forces in field conditions, travelling the hostile roads and receive AFComms if anything. Congratulations to those who've worked hard to earn awards.
Mickey, Ft Walton Beach FL
 
4/26/2012 9:20:59 AM ET
I like the article. PB brings up a good point, but if you're going to write something put your name on it. I suspect many comments would not have been made or would have been toned down.
Robert Davidson, Dyess AFB
 
4/26/2012 9:17:17 AM ET
PB I disagree with you. As long as the comment is not a derogatory one PA should never censor it. We serve to protect our freedom and should be the first in line to encourage free speech. Being sarcastic and rudeness unfortunately is a vice but we are humans.
Check Six, USA
 
4/25/2012 10:00:50 PM ET
Some valid points but an overall Utopian mindframe. Anyone with half a brain that has spent more than 10 minutes in the AF knows there are pitfalls associated with constructive and objective feedback if it is unpopular. AF leadership should appreciate this feedback nonetheless. This article in my opinion is on the very threshold of an attempt to censor public opinion. Or at least coerce against taking unpopular positions on important issues. Sure, a lot of the comments are immature whining from a generation of entitled Airmen. But some of the feedback is rational and reasonable. Leaders should encourage ALL inputs and filter out the invalid comments as each situation warrants. Some of the younger Airmen might not have any ideas for solutions but as a leader you should still be interested in their inputs and hearing problems they are identifying. What I gleaned from the volumes of comments was that many people feel the BSM standard if there is such a thing got watered down
Data Masked, Niceville
 
4/25/2012 4:27:08 PM ET
Although I agree that it's pretty weak for someoone to be outright disrepectful while hiding behind their computer I still fully support someone's right to remain anonymous. Anonymity provides Air Force military and civilian members the opportunity to provide candid feedback without the fear of retribution from senior members who may not share the same views. That's a good thing
Anonymous Major, Staff
 
4/25/2012 12:19:44 PM ET
Amen As someone who has been on the receiving end of letters to the editor for longer than I care to admit this has always been an issue. In the old days i.e. pre-Internet we simply refused to print letters without verifiable signatures. Now every weasel with a gripe can hide behind the elecronic anonymity that allows them to sound off with complete impunity. While the Internet has brought us innumerable advances in communication it has also unfortunately brought us the phenomenon of the angry ranter with a small mind and other even smaller anatomical landmarks.
Dick Hodgson, Texas
 
4/25/2012 12:12:18 PM ET
Maj Herritage: I agree with you and think it goes back to INTEGRITY. Its just simple sign your name to what you write. If you are not Airman enough to stand behind your words then keep them to yourself until you are ready to stand behind them. Another thought is if you won't say it in front of your Airmen Peers and Commander at the same time then you really need to think if you it needs to be said in this forum. If you are that ashamed or think you might get further guidance for what you are typing then you probably shouldn't type it until you are ready to stand behind your thoughts and wordsMSgt David Vasser
MSgt David Vasser, Offutt AFB
 
4/25/2012 11:45:24 AM ET
What's even more interesting about many of the comments on AF.mil as a whole is the amount of disrespect you see towards those who have given full namerank. I've never seen a SSgt tell a CMSgt or an officer face to face some of the things you'll see someone who signs as SSgt Deployed tell those same folks via the anonymity of the internet. Apparently when you log into the internet military customs and courtesies no longer apply...
MSgt Joshua Gray, 2CTCS Hill AFB
 
4/25/2012 11:37:09 AM ET
Well said. Own it
TSgt Kaz, Tinker AFB
 
4/25/2012 11:16:25 AM ET
I totally agree with the AF on taking away the flight suits and jackets from the people in Space Command. If you don't fly you should wear the flight suits. The airmen who are on flight status are doing a great job and deserve to wear something that sets them apart from other airmen. I was not on flying status when on active duty but when I was stationed at Vandenberg AFB Ca. in POL we were given flight jackets but they were taken away. I did not resent that and understood the reason why.
Homer Stiltz, Travis AFB Ca
 
4/25/2012 11:00:07 AM ET
More and more newspapers are going to a Facebook login for their comments section meaning those commenting on stories are identified. Of course the same newspapers still use anonymous sources in their own stories but that's another subject. I agree with the policy of having the commenter identify him or herself. As members of the profession of arms or retired members in my case we should have enough moral courage and demonstrate leadership by putting a name with our comments. It's easy for people to hide behind anonymous but it takes a true leader and person of character to put their name to their criticisms.
Jason Haag, Colorado Springs
 
4/25/2012 10:28:29 AM ET
There's another side to this as well the public affairs folks who approve almost every comment. If a comment is rude or sarcastic why is someone in a public affairs shop approving them I know PAs are skittish about censoring comments but maybe that's what needs to happen.
PB, US
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
Air Force Week in Photos

Senior leaders testify on health of personnel programs

Through Airmen's Eyes: The walk toward flight  3

Affordability priority for F-35 program  4

Reservists ready for wildland fire season  1

Indonesian, U.S. forces practice humanitarian evacuation

Former Ellsworth wing commander honored

U.S.-Australia agreement promotes space situational awareness

Edwards completes tests to extend KC-135  8

VA launches hotline for health care, women veteran questions

Ramstein Airmen train with Romanian counterparts  2

Langley selected for 'better foods, better bodies' pilot

EPA recognizes Air Force renewable energy efforts  1

SecAF: Readiness, modernization in flux

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Leadership not defined by shapes, sizes  1

The difficult discussion   1


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security & Policy     No Fear Act     E-publishing