Official Site of the U.S. Air Force   Right Corner Banner
Join the Air Force

News > Feature - Combat Ops Space Cell: Defending critical satellite links
 
Photos 
CAOC Combat Ops Space Cell: Defending CENTOM critical SATCOM links
Capt. Brandon Davenport diagrams how to geolocate a jamming signal Feb. 28, 2013, at a deployed location in Southwest Asia. Davenport is the U.S. Air Forces Central Command Combined Air and Space Operations Center Combat Operations Division Space Cell chief. Jamming is the denial, whether intentional or accidental, of a satellite's ability to communicate by overwhelming it with another signal. Geolocating allows coalition forces to reliably attribute the source of the jamming signal and help prevent it from happening again. (U.S. Air Force photo/Tech. Sgt. Mike Andriacco)
Download HiRes
Combat Ops Space Cell: Defending critical satellite links

Posted 3/7/2013   Updated 3/7/2013 Email story   Print story

    


by Tech. Sgt. Mike Andriacco
U.S. Air Forces Central Command Public Affairs


3/7/2013 - SOUTHWEST ASIA (AFNS) -- More than 22,000 miles away, spinning silently through the vacuum of space, is one of the most critical components to air, space and cyberspace superiority today; a satellite.

The mission to defend and protect the operability of that satellite rests a little closer to home, at the U.S. Air Forces Central Command Combined Air and Space Operations Center within the Combat Operations Division's Space Cell.

"We have five priority missions we support," said Capt. Brandon Davenport, the Space Cell chief. "Theater missile warning, personnel recovery support, satellite communications, GPS constellation health and modeling as well as battle space characterization."

One of the biggest threats to satellite communications and GPS missions is its vulnerability to electromagnetic interference, or EMI, which causes the signal to be "jammed."

Jamming, at its most basic level, is denying a satellite the ability to communicate by overwhelming it with energy where it would expect to see the friendly signal. This is basically like someone using a bullhorn to drown out someone else's conversation. This type of occurrence can be intentional, in which case it is considered hostile, or accidental. The most common causes of accidental EMI are easily found and remedied. Hostile jamming, however, can require a more creative solution.

"To assure minimal operational impact, our communicators systematically work through actions to quickly restore the services affected," said Lt. Col. Jason Knight, the director of Space Force's assigned space weapons officer. "If the EMI is determined to be intentional, we engage up the chain and through other governmental agencies to apply non-lethal or lethal national instruments of power in order to quickly restore services and resolve the problem."

EMI resolution would not be possible without cross-combatant command and cross-agency collaboration between space and cyber professionals, or one of the most technical aspects of the space cell's mission, geolocation of a hostile jamming signal.

"Our focus is to track down a jamming signal with high-confidence and say 'it's this guy,'" Knight said. "By combining our cyber and space expertise at the operational and tactical levels we are better able to attribute and identify sources of interference, and eliminate intentional denial of SATCOM by our adversaries."

Because the satellite transmission spreads out as it travels toward Earth at the speed of light, each satellite covers an area approximately one-third of the planet's surface from its perch far into outer space. This allows for overlap between several satellites and grants U.S. forces the flexibility to shift to another satellite if necessary to complete the mission.

The linchpin in this whole process is Operation Silent Sentry, run by members of the 379th Expeditionary Operations Squadron. The Silent Sentry team's mission is to monitor hundreds of satellite transmissions every week using the Rapid Attack Identification Detection Reporting System and help detect and locate signals that do not belong on U.S. satellites, such as a jammer.

"The Silent Sentry antennas and our satellites represent two known locations and the jammer a third, unknown location," Davenport said. "Because we start knowing two out of three points, and have both frequency and time values available to us, we can use algebra to figure out a line running north south as well as a line running east and west of possible locations. Where those lines cross, we'll find the offending transmitter. "

Though the technology does not yet exist to prevent jamming, the available actions that the U.S. military and its allies may take can be swift and decisive.

"Most emitters that put our systems at risk can be identified by our teams," Davenport said. "During combat, an adversary could technically jam our satellite signals, but we can recover fairly quickly, attribute the source of interference and respond accordingly."



tabComments
3/13/2013 5:00:45 AM ET
DMPI I don't understand Can you go over it one more time
Don Keedic, Fuel Cell
 
3/12/2013 9:47:02 AM ET
Gabe you miss the point and this is the wrong article as the subject of your rant but learn how the air and space part of the war works. This is not about the stupid new medal nor is it about those not in physical danger. This is about the element of the CAOC that is in charge of EXECUTION OF COMBAT OPERATIONS at the operational level of war. These divisions labelled 'Combat' are not fighters themselves but they are the ones who run the war. Until the Joint and Service Pubs change the names the word 'Combat' will still be there. Get it now
DMPI, Five-Sided Fantasy Land
 
3/11/2013 4:38:32 PM ET
I can see where PB is coming from. Not in physical Danger Not in combat. But I dont care if the career feild wants to call itself combat as long as they are not getting Bronze stars with Valor or higher for that matter.What got me was that the CYBER defense Metal and UAV operator metals where HIGHER THAN THE PURPLE HEART AND BRONZE STAR Thats utterly disgraceful
Gabe, ga
 
3/8/2013 2:58:10 PM ET
Hey PB Combat Ops Div is an element under the Joint or Combined Forces Air Component Commander found in a Joint or Combined Air Operations Center. 'The COD is responsible for the execution of the current ATO usually the 24 hours encompassing the effective period of the ATO. The COD is divided into four teams offensive operations defensive operations interface control and the senior intelligence duty officer SIDO team. Additionally various specialty support personnel are embedded in the COD.' From JP 3-30 Appendix F.
DMPI, Five-Sided Fantasy Land
 
3/7/2013 6:04:08 PM ET
Not going to lie I still have a problem describing something as combat when people's lives aren't physically in danger.
PB, US
 
Add a comment

 Inside AF.mil

ima cornerSearch

tabSubscribe AF.MIL
tabMore HeadlinesRSS feed 
CSAF to sponsor 3 captains for PhD program

Davis-Monthan Airmen work to end veteran homelessness by 2015

Jennies to jets to stealth: Bomb wing turns 90

Concentration camp survivor to fighter pilot: 'Freedom a beautiful thing'  5

Wounded warriors adapt, overcome at Andrews sports camp

Pilots, combat systems officers may be eligible for retention incentives   2

Alert Reaper Airmen find IED  1

Luke AFB F-16 crashes, pilots safely eject  4

AF drops 50,000 plus gallons of retardant on Colorado fires

352nd SOG welcomes Osprey to fleet

SecDef: DOD welcomes Supreme Court decision  37

Weather warns warriors, saves services silver  1

Squadron's lone female gunner aims high  4

Flight engineer reaches combat sortie milestone  4

tabCommentaryRSS feed 
Our commitment, our community

'Lucky' people take personal responsibility for their own success  16


Site Map      Contact Us     Questions     USA.gov     Security and Privacy notice     E-publishing  
Suicide Prevention      Sexual Assault Awareness & Prevention     FOIA     IG   EEO